Posted on

kush ben yamini seeds

Kush ben yamini seeds
There is only one text that stands out in contrast to the favorable
pronouncements which seem to predominate in later years, and that is in the
Tanna d’bei Eliahu.

Rabbi Norbert’s Comments and Events

Events page for Hollywood Temple Beth El and posts on Jewish topics for a contemporary audience by Rabbi Norbert Weinberg


Friday, July 22, 2016

Free download of Courage of the Spirit August 1-5

I have been informed by several people outside the US that they had trouble with the download..

First, be sure that you have clicked on the button in the middle of the page that says “kindle” , not “paperback. ” If its till shows a fee, then go to the bottom of the page, look for a link to Amazon USA and then enter the book and my name in the search. It may work from the USA version only.
Best wishes,
Regards, Norbert

Please download the ebook from Amazon from August 1 through August 5,
and forward this email to your friends and contacts as a way of helping me honor my parents and spreading the message of Courage of the Spirit..

Shalom and regards,

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Leadership through the Lens of the Bible’s King Saul

This week, the Torah portion, Korach, told was the account of the double rebellion against Moses and Aaron. The tribe of Reuben led the rebellion of the political parties against Moses, while Korach led the rebellion within the inner circle of the party elites, Aaron and sons. In tandem, the Haftarah records the Samuel, who defends his record and integrity to the people while giving in to their demand for an authoritarian leader, a king. That king, Saul and his comparison to David, became the subject of my investigation into his personality and leadership strengths and flaws in Biblical, 2nd Temple and Midrashic texts.
Is the better leader the one who stands “from his shoulder and above, taller than all” or the flawed one who bore the sin of Bath Sheva?

The article in copied below,( transcribed as a word document from a pdf file)

Conservative Judaism, Vol. 33 No. 3 Copyright © 1980 by the Rabbinical Assembly
Reprinted from Conservative Judaism, Vol. 33, No. 3, Spring, 1980, pp.7-21 with the
permission of The Rabbinical Assembly.

Norbert Weinberg

The image conceived of historical figures by later generations can be vastly
different from the image held by that personage s contemporaries. This can
be said easily of modern political figures, who can be successively praised or
damned; it can be shown to be so of biblical figures in the perspective of later
generations of Jewish commentators as well.

A biblical figure can be turned upside down, as it were. If Enoch
“walked with God” in the book of Genesis (4:24), in the book of Enoch he is a
divine being, but according to Genesis Rabbah (25:1), “He is not recorded in
the lists of the righteous, but of the wicked!” On the other hand, a villain the
likes of King Menassah can be sympathized with and called “Our Rabbi” in
Sanhedrin (102b).

If such is the treatment of blatant saints and sinners, how much more so
in the case of King Saul, a figure at once praiseworthy and pitiable as
described in the Bible. What happens in the writings from the close of the
Bible up until the talmudic period, in the Apocrypha, in Tannaitic and
Amoraic texts, in halakhic and aggadic discussions?

The biblical picture of Saul is favorable. “Young and goodly, and there
was none among the children of Israel a goodlier person than he; from his
shoulder and upwards, he was taller than any of the people” (I Samuel 9:2).
He is considerate of his father (9:5) and modestly tells no one of his anoint­ment
by Samuel (10:16). The spirit of prophecy enters him (10:10) and his
outstanding trait, modesty (9:21), is reflected in his hiding from the populace
on the day of his election (10:22). He is, as well, the successful unifier and
leader of his people at the start of the wars against the Ammonites and the
Philistines (chapters 11-14).

His decline is well delineated. He offers sacrifice without waiting for
Samuel (13:11) and he loses Samuel’s support, as well as God’s, for sparing
Agag, king of Amalek. He deteriorates rapidly, consumed by jealousy of his
rival, David; he regresses from depression to plotting to attempted murder to
massacre. Nevertheless, there is sympathy for the man throughout the por­trayal:
Samuel laments for him; David eulogizes him; and Saul dies nobly by
his own hand rather than falling into Philistine hands to be disgraced.

There are indirect references to Saul, as in Psalms 7 (Cush the Benja-
minite) and Esther 2:3 (the son of Kish, a Benjaminite), which are expounded
upon in later Rabbinic texts. Some Psalms are dedicated to incidents in
David s experiences with Saul (Psalms 52, 54, 57, 59). Only in Chronicles is
there an extensive block of references to Saul: chapter 10 depicts Saul s last
battle with the Philistines and his death. At no point is it mentioned that he
had been appointed legitimately by Samuel, nor are his successes in battle
recorded, and he is referred to as “king” only in retrospect by the populace
when urging David to become king (I Chronicles 11:2). We are given, instead
of the balanced view found in Samuel, a blanket condemnation.

So Saul died for his transgressions, which he committed against the Lord, because of the
word of God which he kept not; and also for that he asked counsel of a ghost, to inquire
thereby, and inquired not of the Lord; therefore He slew him and turned the kingdom
unto David, the son of Jesse. (I Chronicles 10:13-14).

Whereas the book of Samuel is a product of monarchic times, written
while popular memories may yet have been fresh and while extensive records
may have been available, Chronicles is considered to be a work of the Second
Commonwealth period, when the Davidic dynasty had ceased to be a reality
and had become an ideal. King David, forerunner of the awaited descendant
who would fulfill all the expectations of the prophets, could do no great
wrong; thus the story of Bat Sheva is missing from this collection. On the
other hand, Saul, forerunner and threat to this ideal David, could do no right.

Herein is the first revisionist edition of the life of Saul; not even the central
act, the sparing of Agag, is given as the reason for Saul s falling. For Samuel to
turn away from Saul would be to cast legitimacy on Saul up to that point.
Saul’s crime is one which in post-exilic eyes is far greater: “He asked counsel
of a ghost.” Saul does not betray Samuel s orders; he betrays the essence of

Saul in the Apocrypha and Second Temple Period Texts

The writers of the apocrypha follow in the school of thought of the author(s)
of Chronicles in regards to King Saul.

The Wisdom of Ben Sira, written at the beginning of the second century
b.c.e ., includes a list of heroes of Israel. In chapter 46, it is written of Samuel:
“He established the monarchy and anointed rulers over his people” (46:13).
“Even after he had gone to his rest, he prophesied and foretold to the king his
death, lifting up his voice in prophecy from the ground to wipe out the
people’s guilt” (46:20).Saul is never mentioned by name, even though he is
mentioned as “king,” while David, Solomon, Hezekiah, and Josiah are directly
included as positive figures. No reference is made to his acts of heroism
or greatness. Ben Sira’s interests are pedagogical, not political; he presents to
the reader the ideal type; he mentions Jeroboam as an example of iniquity,
and Solomon is included, despite his faults, since “He will not wipe out the
children of his chosen servant” (47:22). For Ben Sira, Saul is at best of
doubtful caliber and has no place in a portrayal of model figures.

The Ethiopian book of Enoch follows in this tradition of denigrating Saul.
Using the vehicle of animal metaphors for Jewish history, the author writes:
The dogs, jackals, and wild boars began to devour the flock until the lord o f the flock
appointed another sheep, a ram, from their midst, to lead them. The ram began to butt
on all sides at the dogs and jackals and boars, until he destroyed them completely. Then
that sheep opened his eyes and saw that the ram, in the midst o f his flock, abandoned his
glory and began to butt his own flock, trample them and go wild. The lord o f the flock
sent the first sheep to another one to be ram in place o f the ram that had desecrated its
glory. (9:42-46)3

The story of the ram, Saul, had been turned completely around; first,
Saul goes mad and kills his own, and only then does Samuel remove him. The
accusation of Saul oppressing his own people is unknown in the Bible.

If Ben Sira writes as a pedagogue, the author of Enoch is an es-
chatologist. The pedagogue seeks an ideal model and therefore exludes Saul.
Enoch is a product of apocalyptic circles, wherein the world is black or white,
saint or sinner; presumably this outlook developed during Antiochene perse­cutions,
not much after the time of Ben Sira, and continued to be significant
into the years following the fall of the Second Temple.4 The book of Enoch is
assumed to have been written at the time of John Hyrcanus; if so, the author
envisions Saul as a prototype of the Hasmonean rulers who turned from
defending against the oppressors to being the oppressors. As they await a
Davidic deliverer, they can have no patience for any contender to the throne
of Israel, before or after David.

There is a work , Liber Antiquitatem Biblius, whose author is referred to as
Pseudo-Philo.5 The dating is in dispute, posited as early as Hasmonean times
or as late as the fall of Jerusalem in 70 c.E . Biblical history is intentionally
rewritten; Saul in particular suffers from this revisionism. According to this
text, Saul spares Agag and his wife for purposes of greed, as they promise to
reveal to him the wherabouts of Amalekite wealth. Therefore Saul is pun­ished
in the following manner: that night of captivity, Agag is allowed to be
with his wife, who then conceives; she is spared while Agag is slain. The fruit
of that union becomes the armor bearer to Saul; Saul does not commit
suicide, but is killed by the son of Agag. From this young man is Haman
descended. Lest one think that Saul s motive in killing all diviners was noble,
Pseudo-Philo charges him with doing this only to attain glory (Pseudo-Philo
55:58, 59:64).6

During this period, is there no voice favorable to Saul?
In the scroll of Esther, Mordecai is described as “the son of Kish, the
(Ben)jaminite,, and Haman as “the Agagite.” What the first Benjaminite,
Saul, failed, his descendant Mordecai achieves, an early example of a mid-
rashic tit for tat (midah keneged midah).

Saul of Tarsus, later to be known as Paul, addresses his audience (Romans 11:7; Phillipians 3:5) and emphasizes his descent from the tribe of Benjamin. Presumably, by this time Saul was an
acceptable name, and his intentional choice of the tribe of Benjamin was,
according to Klausner, in order to associate himself with the lineage of King
Saul, just as Jesus was of the lineage of King David. 7

Josephus is the first to attempt an analysis of Saul s personality; he is
perhaps the first Jewish historian to attempt “psychohistory.” In Antiquities
of the Jews (Book 6, chapters 4-14) he follows the general outline of the
biblical account, embellishing it with his insights for the Roman readership.
Saul’s comprehension and wisdom are described as greater than his beauty,
and his hiding during his election as king was sign of his outstanding modesty
(chapter 4). Even his initial intention in the war with Amalek was good; in
order to show his zeal for God, he speedily made all arrangements for warfare
and set out to totally destroy Amalek (chapter 7).

It is, up to this point, the most favorable description of Saul. It must be
remembered that Josephus, unlike the authors of previously cited works, is
writing for a non-Jewish audience; he wishes to portray his people in as noble
a light as possible to the Romans, who had been in a violent conflict with the
Jews.8 In describing Saul’s downfall, he suggests the following: “He also took
Agag, the enemy’s king, captive; the beauty and tallness of whose body he
admired so much, that he thought him worthy of preservation” (Book 6,
chapter 7, section 2).

Saul s ultimate degeneration, Josephus writes, is common to many lead­ers:
While they are private persons, and in a low condition . . . they are equitable, moder­ate,
and pursue nothing but what is ju st and bend their whole minds and labors that way
. . . but when once they are into power and authority, then they cut off all such notions;
and as if they were actors upon a theater, they lay aside their disguised parts and
manners, and take up boldness, insolence, and a contempt o f both human and divine
laws. (Chapter 12, section 7)9

It is common for Josephus, writing for a Roman audience, to find erotic
motives for human behavior. It is very likely that Josephus is also interjecting
his own experiences as a leader in the war against Rome, on the one hand,
and as insider to the Roman court, on the other; perhaps it is Josephus’ own
confession of his behavior during the war.

A comparable attempt at using psychology to understand Saul can also be
found in the period between the times of Ben Sira and Josephus.
Abot d’Rabbi Nathan preserves material attributed to the Zugot, the sages from
Alexander’s conquest till the time of Hillel and Shammai. In a statement
attributed to Judah ben Tabbai:

Whoever would have told me that I would arise to a position of authority would have
been physically attacked by me. Now that 1 have attained office, I would pour a kettle of
boiling water upon whosoever would tell me “Get d ow n” Just as it is difficult to rise to
greatness, so is it difficult to descend therefrom. Just so was it with Saul, that when he
was told he would become king, he hid, as it is written, “He hid behind the vessels ” but
when he was told to get down, he pursued David with intent to kill. (version A 10:1 )

A similar statement is made in the name of Joshua ben Perachya, the
predecessor of the above-quoted sage; it is recorded in Menahot 109b. The
two are often interchanged in various texts, but, whoever the speaker, the
time frame is the turn of the second century b .c .e .

Midrashic Texts Critical of Saul

Unlike apocryphal texts or Josephus’ works , which are extended discourses, the
writings of the Midrash are a verse by verse and sometimes word for word
exposition of the text. In this process, the author is freed from the context of
the Bible to derive his desired conclusion about the text. It is this style of
literature which is associated with the major Jewish works in the last years of
the Second Temple and in the generations following: Mekhilta, Sifra,
Tal­mud, Midrash Rabbah, for example. Some of this material continues in the
antagonistic vein of the apocalytpic and apocryphal writers.
There is an attempt to restructure the text of Chronicles on Saul’s
downfall to correspond with details in the book of Samuel:

For five sins Saul died, as it is written, “So Saul died for his transgressions which he
committed against the Lord” (I Chronicles 10:13). As Samuel said to him, “Seven days
shall you tarry, till I come unto thee” (I Samuel 10:8), which he failed to do; “I forced
myself therefore and offered the burnt offering” (13:12) (1). “Because o f the word of the
Lord, which he kept not” (I Chronicles 10:13) – that he spared Agag (2). That he
destroyed Nob, city o f priests (3). “That he asked of a ghost” (Ibid.) (4). “And did not
inquire o f the Lord” (Ibid.) – that refers to Saul telling the priest, “Withdraw your
hand’’ (I Samuel 14:19) (5). (Midrash Shmuel 24:7)

The author is committed to the number five; he therefore adds to the
items in Chronicles the slaying of the priests of Nob, even though no textual
ground is given. The author of the midrash is also pressed to explain when it
was that Saul did not inquire of the Lord, so he has interpreted the reference
to Saul s order to the priest to withdraw his hand from the ephod
as failing to ask God’s advice before entering into combat, whereas the original text
demonstrates, instead, the urgency of the situation, not a failure on Saul s
part. (Indeed, Targum translates this phrase as “bring the ephod,” which has
the opposite connotation.)

Another version is recorded in Vayikra Rabbah 26:7, and Shlomo Buber,
in his comments to Midrash Shmuel, suggests that the original version
associated “which he committed” in Chronicles with the death of the priests
at Nob. The opening note to Psalms 7 refers it to “the matter of Cush Ben-
yamini,” and Midrash Tehilim 7:18 presumes this to be Saul, the son of Kish,
the Benjaminite:

Was Saul indeed an Ethiopian (Kushi)? “He did not wait” (for Samuel’s return at Gilgal)
and “God gave him another heart” (when Saul joined the band o f prophets). Thus
Samuel said to him, “What have you done?” He answered, “Because I saw that the
people were scattered from me and thou came not within the days appointed . . . and 1
offered burnt offering” (13:12). To prove the spiritual blackness of Saul, as implied by “Ethiopian,” a
verse is taken out of context. Whereas Saul s change of heart is implied to be
for the better, it is here interpreted to mean for the worse, for failing to wait
for Samuel.

Saul is depicted as arrogant and quarrelsome before God in the text of Kohelet Rabbah
7:33 (and, similarly, in Yoma 22b and Midrash Shmuel 18:3-4):

“Be not righteous overmuch; neither make thyself overwise” (Ecclesiastes 7:16). Don’t be
more righteous than your Creator; this refers to Saul, as it is written, “And Saul came to
the city of Amalek” (I Samuel 15:5). The continuation o f the text is “and laid in wait in
the valley. ” Rav Huna and Rav Banayah12 say, “He began to question the judgment o f
his creator, and said, ‘The Holy One said to attack Amalek. I f the men sinned, what did
the women do, or the children, or the cattle?’ A heavenly voice announced, ‘Be not more
righteous than your Creator¡”’ The Rabbis said, “He began to dispute about the calf of
the broken neck. He said, ‘The text tells us, “They break the neck o f the calf in the valley”
(in case o f an unsolved homicide) (Deuteronomy 21:4). This one is killed and the other
one has its neck broken. This one sinned, what did the other do? A heavenly voice
announced, ‘Be not righteous overmuch! ” Rav Shimon ben Lakish said, “Whoever is
merciful instead o f cruel will in the end be cruel when it is time to be merciful; from
whence do we know that he will be cruel instead of merciful? It is stated, ‘He struck Nob,
city o f the priests, with the sword from man to woman, child to babe, ox, donkey, and
sheep, by sword’ (I Samuel 22:18). Let not the fate o f Nob be as that of the seed of
Amalek!” The Rabbis said, ‘Whoever is merciful instead o f cruel (at the necessary
moment) is struck by the attribute o f law (middat hading as is stated, ‘Saul and his three
sons died”’ (I Samuel 31:6).

The text revolves around several key words. The following verse in
Ecclesiastes chimes in, “Why die before your time” (verse 17) and Saul is an
appropriate example of someone who died in his prime. The Hebrew for “laid
in wait” is vayarev, which is lacking the necessary letter aleph for vayaarev.13
It is read as meaning “riv” for quarrel, and hence the question of
the nature of the quarrel. One interpretation reflects the malaise with the
severity of the punishment inflicted upon Amalek but is placed in the mouth
of Saul and thereby discredited. The use of a negative character to phrase
problems of conscience is similarly done in the account of Korach and the
widow s plight as a consequence of Moses’ taxation in
Midrash Tehilim 1:15. 14
The other version responds to the reference to “valley”; if the text in
the Bible is understood as “He quarreled about the valley,” then the associa­tion
of murder, a trait of Amalek, with valley, finds its complement in the law
of the calf whose neck is to be broken in a valley in the case of an unsolved

Saul’s meeting with the Witch of Ein-dor incorporates a touch of irony:
“A man or a woman that has a familiar spirit” (Leviticus 20:27). Rav Joshua o f Sichnin
said in the name o f Rav Levi: A man – that is Saul. . . To what can Saul be compared?
To a king who has ordered all the roosters to be slaughtered. He then asks, “Bring me a
rooster to crow!” They answer, “Did you not proclaim, ‘Execute all roosters! ” Thus Saul
removed diviners and those familiar with spirits from the earth. (Vayikra Rabbah 26:7)

The accusation in Chronicles that Saul did not inquire of the Lord is
dealt with in depth in two other references. The first is a continuation of the
above material from Vayikra Rabbah:

“I am sore distressed . . . and God is departed from me, and answers me no more,
neither by prophets nor by dreams” (I Samuel 28:15). Why did he not add Urim and
Thummim? Said Rabbi Isaac b. Hiya: “You brought it on yourself. You destroyed Nob,
city of the priests. ” Because he sinned against the priests (in charge of the oracles) so he
was punished with this sin as well. Just as he killed the priests, so he incurred death for
this sin of the oracle and diviner.

The second sheds light on the passage quoted above, from
Midrash Shmuel, in which this sin is associated with I Samuel 14:16-23:

“Thy word is a lamp to guide my feet and a light to my path” (Psalms 119:105). When did
David recite this verse? When he went to the Valley o f Refaim; even then he did not
proceed to fig ht until he inquired o f the Urim and Thummim. When Samuel proceeded
to anoint David, the angels contested it before God, saying, “Lord of the World, why
have you taken the kingdom from Saul and given it to David?” He answered, “1 will tell
you the difference between Saul and David. Saul began to inquire o f the oracle, but
when he saw the Philistines approach, he ordered the priest ‘hold your hand.’ But
David, when he saw the Philistines approach at Refaim, immediately inquired o f the
Urim and Thummim, as it says, The Philistines made another attack . . . David inquired
of the Lord ” (II Samuel 5:23). (Midrash Tehilim 27:2)

One last example of critical midrash utilizes Saul s physical traits in
contrast with his spiritual faults:

The Rabbis taught (in baraita): Five were created in the heavenly pattern, and all were
injured on that account: Samson – with his strength; Saul – with his height; Absalom –
with his hair; Zedekiah -w ith his eyes; Asa – with his fe e t. . . Saul, with his neck, as it is
written, “And Saul took his own sword and fell on it” (I Samuel 31:4). (Sotah 10a).
In Sotah 1:8 there is a comparable thought:

“He had a son whose name was Saul, and there was no one o f Israel who was better than
he” (1 Samuel 9:2). Could this mean in all respects better? We are taught, “from his
shoulders and above, taller than his fellow” (Ibid.). (Also see Midrash Shmuel 13:7.)
For these critics, Saul s virtue started and stopped at his neck.

Drashot Offering Benefit of the Doubt

Just as the text attributed to Judah ben Tabbai some three centuries or more
before the editing of the Mishnah attempted to understand Saul from the
standpoint of human emotion, so do later statements, in accord with the
concept: “A man does not sin, unless the spirit of foolishness has entered

Blame is placed on Doeg, the advisor, as the cause of Saul s harsh
downfall. Doeg, along with Balaam, Ahitophel, and Gehazi, has no place in
the world to come (Sanhedrin 10:2). Why is he called “Doeg the Edomite,”
the reddish one?:

Bar Kapara said, “That he withheld the blood o f Agag from Saul, by quoting, ‘You shall
not slaughter it and its calf on the same day (Leviticus 22:28). You would kill child and
elder, babe and woman on the same day!’ Hence he was called the red one, since he
caused Saul to be held liable on his account.” (Midrash Tehilim 32:4)

Bar Kapara takes the doubt which was attributed to Saul in Kohelet Rabbah
by Rav Huna and moves it to Doeg. He is also attributed with the following statement: “‘And Saul and the people had pity on Agag (I Samuel 15:9) — that is Doeg, who was equal to all Israel”
(Midrash Shmuel 18:4).15

The blame is placed upon Doeg for the massacre at Nob as well:

“He told Saul” (Psalm 52:2, about Ahimelech). What is “He told”? Thus he said, “David
has made himself king in your lifetime, since one does not inquire o f the Urim and
Thummim unless one is king or court or where the public weal depends upon it.
However, David has inquired o f them. . . . ” (Saul) said to Doeg, “You struck them with
your speech, now strike them with the sword.” (Midrash Tehilim 52:5)

The biblical text makes it clear that inquiring of the oracle was Doeg’s fabrication; the midrash clarifies its impact:

“You love evil over good, a lie above a word of righteousness” (Psalm 52:5). David said to
Doeg, “You prefer the harm to Saul over his well-being, for had he not heard slander
from you, he would not have been punished!” (Midrash Tehilim 52:7)

Responsibility is likewise placed upon Abner for not protesting to Saul and thereby stopping him
(Yerushalmi Peah 1:1 and Babli Sanhedrin 20a). It is even thrust upon the shoulders of David and Jonathan by Rav, quoted by Rav Yehudah:

Said the Holy One, Blessed be He, to David, “How long will this sin be buried in your
hands” (referring to the massacre) – “by your hands Saul and his three sons were
killed!” (Sanhedrin 95a). Had David not sought refuge, the massacre would not have
taken place.

Said Rav Yehuda in the name o f Rav, “Had Jonathan only given David two loaves o f
bread, the priests o f the city would not have been killed, Doeg would not have been
condemned, and Saul and his three sons would not have been killed.” (Sanhedrin 104a)

The Rabbis are always eager to teach the power of confession and
repentance. Thus again, in the name of Rav, quoted by Rabbah bar Haninah
Saba: Whoever transgresses and is then ashamed o f it has his sins forgiven. . . . Samuel said to
Saul, “Why have you disturbed me and brought me up?” Saul said, “I am in great
trouble. The Philistines are pressing upon me and God has turned away from me. He no
longer answers me through dreams or prophets, and I have summoned you to tell me
what I should do” (I Samuel 28:15). Why did he not mention the Urim and Thummim?
Because he had killed the people o f the priestly city o f Nob (an act o f which he was
ashamed). Whence do we know he was forgiven in the eyes o f Heaven? “Tomorrow you
and your sons are with me” (verse 19). Said Rav Yochanan, “With me -o n my side.” The
Rabbis said it is learned from this verse, “We shall put them to death at Gibeah o f Saul,
chosen o f the Lord” (II Samuel 21:6). It was a heavenly voice that announced the words,
“chosen o f the Lord. ” (Berakhot 12b) 15

Doeg is head of the court (Midrash Tehilim 3:4) and a great scholar (Yerushalmi Sanhedrin 15:2). In
this period, in Rabbinic retrospect, every child studied halakhah (Vayikra Rabbah 26:7).
Rabbi Shimon bar Lakish adopts a similar theme in regard to Saul’s atonement, which can be contrasted with the criticism recorded in his name on the theme of “merciful instead of cruel” mentioned above:

At that moment, the Holy One, Blessed be He, called to his angels and said: “See my
creation. In the normal way o f the world, a man goes to the house o f drink and does not
take his sons with him fo r fear that it would be unseemly. But this one knows that he is to
be killed, takes his three sons with him, and rejoices in accepting the decree that strikes
him. (Midrash Shmuel 24:6 and Vayikra Rabbah 26:7)

A common theme of Rabbinic doctrine is the assumption that all the figures of the Bible were engaged in halakhic discussion in the same manner carried out in the academies of Yavneh or Sura. Since all Oral Law was interpreted as dating back to Moses, there was the assumption that what was
being taught as new had been said before. Someone as prominent as Saul could only be seen in the pattern of a talmudic sage.

Saul gave the hand of his daughter Michal to another man, when by rights she was the wife of David; Saul, as scholar, could not possibly create an adulterous situation. There is an attempt to find a legal rationale, as in the following text, which transfers the blame, again, to Doeg’s malicious advice:

This one permitted adultery. Said Rav Nachman, son o f Shmuel bar Nachman: “He
permitted his wife because he is a rebel against the government; hence, he is like a dead
man, his blood is free (to be shed) and his wife is free (to be married).” (Bereshit Rabbah

The Tosefta deals in strictly halakhic terms:

How can it be that Michal was given to Adriel? Wasn’t she given to Palti ben Laish, as it
says, “And Saul gave Michal, his daughter, the wife o f David, to Paltiel ben Laish of
Gallim ’ (I Samuel 25:42)! Rather they compared the marriage o f Michal to the marriage
o f Merav. Just as the marriage o f Michal to Adriel was a sin, so was the marriage o f
Merav a sin. The students of Rabbi Yose asked, “How can it be that David married his
wife’s sister? He married her after the death o f Merav.” And Rabbi Joshua b. Karha
said, “The marriage was not correctly carried out, hence they were not considered
married.” (Sota 11, p. 316, Zuckermandel ed.)

The error involved in the original marriage is developed in full in Sanhedrin

What marriage took place in error? It is written, “Whoever slays (Goliath) will the king
make rich and give his daughter’ (I Samuel 17:25). David killed him and came to Saul,
“You have a promisory loan from me. ” But a woman engaged by a loan is not engaged.
Therefore, he gave her to Adriel, as it is written, “At the time that Merav, Saul’s
daughter, should have been given to David, she was given to Adriel the Mecholite as
wife” (I Samuel 18:19). He then said, “I f you wish that I give you Michal for a wife, bring
me a hundred Philistine foreskins. ” David did so, and said, “You have both a loan and a
prutah’s worth (minimum sum) from me!” Saul was o f the thought, “Loan and prutah,
the intent is on the loan, ” and David was of the thought, “Loan and prutah, the intention
is on the prutah. ” But what if all the world agrees that intent is on the prutah? We can
explain that Saul believed that it had no value, and David believed that it was of value at
least to dogs and cats.

What would seem, in the biblical text, a case of double-dealing, has been
reduced, in Rabbinic discourse, to a halakhic dispute between two scholars of
great rank.

Drashot that Idealize Saul

There is yet a third category of exegesis, fully removed from either the
severe denunciation of a Pseudo-Philo or the psychologizing of a Josephus.
These texts try to portray Saul, even with his faults, as one of the great saints
of the Bible.

A text in Midrash Shmuel, cited earlier, speaks of Saul s five sins. In front of the text of an alternate version, found in Vayikra Rabbah, also quoted earlier, is the caption: “The Rabbis taught: For five sins did this righteous man die” 16 Similarly, the text of Berakhot12a, mentioned above, empha­sizes
that a heavenly voice declared Saul “the chosen of the Lord.”

When David is contrasted to Saul, it is David who is found wanting by comparison:
Zutra bar Tubia taught in the presence o f Rav Judah. He asked, “What is the end o f the
verse, ‘These are the last words o f David?” (II Samuel 23:1). “Last.” “What are the
first?” . . . “And David spoke the words o f this song on the day God saved him from the
hand o f his enemies, from the hand o f Saul” (II Samuel 22:1). God told David, “David,
you sing a song on the fall o f Saul! I f you were Saul, and he David, how many times
would I have destroyed Davids for him!” Therefore in Psalms 7, he wrote shigayon (17 ) of
David, which he sang unto the Lord on the matter o f Kush ben Yamini. Was Kush his
name? Rather Saul was his name; but, just as an Ethiopian is exceptional for his skin, so
was Saul exceptional for his deeds. (Moed Katan 16b)

The same word, Kush, used in Midrash Tehilim to discredit Saul, is used herein to his glory.

Yet the following text, from Midrash Tehilim, also carries the theme of the contrast between Saul and David, to Saul’s credit:

Said the Holy One to David, “Why do you curse my anointed one? You say, ‘All my
enemies will be frustrated and stricken with terror(Psalm s 6:11). Do you call Saul an
enemy! As it says, *On the day God saved him from the hand o f his enemies, from the
hand o f Saul ” (II Samuel 22:1). He said to him, “Lord o f the world, intentional sins are
before you as mere errors, as you said, ‘Errors, who can understand?’” (Psalms 19:13).
(Midrash Tehilim 7:1)

David is forced to ask forgiveness for his arrogance. The theme is then continued in the text:

Rav Shmuel bar Nachman: “You compare yourself to Saul! Saul freed his possessions to
the use of the wars o f Israel, as it says, ‘He took a pair of oxen and cut them (1 Samuel
11:3) and you would compare yourself to Saul! “Lighter than eagles, stronger than
lio ns” (II Samuel 1:23). Rabbi Levi said: “Saul could walk sixty miles in a day.”
The text continues with a discussion of Saul s physical speed, discusses
the statement, “Do not rejoice at the fall of your enemy,” and concludes, in
the words of Rav Aha, “If your luck were the luck of Saul, how many Davids
would I have destroyed for him!”

This concept of man s fortune dependent upon God’s grace and providence is echoed in the following text, the theme of which is strikingly different from the assumed Rabbinic stance, “Everything
is foreseen, but the choice is fully within human hands”:

Said Rav Huna: “How little does a person suffer if the Lord helps him. Saul committed
one sin, and was held accountable; David committed two sins, but was not held liable!
Saul with one sin – the incident o f Agag. But what o f the incident o f Nob? It is after the
incident of Agag that the text says, I repent that 1 have anointed Saul to be King’ (I
Samuel 15:11). What were David s two? The killing of Uriah and the incitement (to
census, according to Rashi). Is there not also the incident o f Bat Sheva? He paid for it.”
(Yoma 22b)

The text of Yoma deals exclusively with Saul, including in it the
aforementioned debate on “Be not righteous.” After listing more of the sins of
David, and realizing that not for David’s greater saintliness was he promoted
but by virtue of Divine fiat, the text continues to examine the reason for
Saul’s removal:

Said Rav Judah in the name o f Samuel, “Why did the house o f Saul not continue to
reign? Because he had no faults, ju st as Rav Yochanan in the name o f Rav Shimon bar
Yehozedek said, One does not appoint an individual to the position o f leader o f the
public unless a box o f lizards hangs behind him (a history o f sin in the family), so that if
his mind errs, they can say, Look behind you. ” Said Rav Judah in the name o f Rav:
“Why was Saul punished? Because he forewent the honor due to him, as it is written,
‘Certain base fellows said: How shall this man save us? And they despised him, and
brought him no present. But he held his peace’ (I Samuel 10:27) and immediately
following, it says, ‘Then Nahash the Ammonite came up and encamped against Jabesh-
Gilead” (a sign o f reproval) (I Samuel 11:1). (Yoma 22b)

What are the characteristics that made Saul a leader in the first place?

Many texts emphasize the obvious picture, in the Bible, of his modesty:

Saul did not merit kingship for any reason other than his modesty, as we are told, “Let
us turn back, or my father will stop worrying about the asses and begin to worry about
us” (I Samuel 9:5). But Samuel responded, “Your father has stopped being worried
about the asses and is worrying about you, saying, ‘What shall I do about my son?’”
(Tosefta Berakhot 4:18)

It is implied herein that Saul, in modesty, included in his father’s concerns his servants as much as himself, an assumption which Samuel repudiates.
His modesty is itself part of a family trait:

“He withdraweth not his eyes from the righteous; but with kings upon the throne, He
sets them forever, and they are excited” (Proverbs 36:7). Said Rav Elazar: For the merit
o f modesty, Rachel deserved that Saul be descended from her. For the merit o f modesty
in him, Saul deserved that Esther be descended from him . . . What was SauYs modesty?
“Concerning the matter of the kingship, whereof Samuel spoke, he told him not” (I
Samuel 10:16). Consequently, he was meritorious, and Esther was his descendant.
(Megillah 13a)

Saul s modesty is exemplified in a text dealing with famous models of
modesty, including Moses, which states:

Thus says the text, “A mans pride shall bring him low, but he that is o f humble spirit
shall attain honor” (Proverbs 29:23). Whoever pursues high office, high office flees from
him, but whoever flees high office, the high office pursues him. Saul fled from his office
at the moment they wished to anoint him king. Said the Holy One to Samuel, “He has hid
himself among the baggage” . . . Baggage refers to Urim and Thummim (Midrash
Aggadah, ed. Buber, Vayikra 1:1 )(T he implication is that Saul let the pronouncement o f
fitness come through divine oracle, not through his own choosing.)

Saul s modesty extended to physical discretion, to the detriment of David s own lack of shame:
Michal said to David, “Today the honor o f my father s house was exposed” (at the time o f
David s wild dance at the return o f the ark). They said of the house of Saul that one
never saw his heel or toe. Thus it is written, “And he came to the sheepcotes by the way,
where there was a cave, and Saul went in to relieve himself a little at a time, and cover it
repeatedly. Said David, “Cursed be whoever touches that righteous one.” (Yerushalmi
Sanhedrin 2:4)

As mentioned above, the biblical figures were all seen as great talmudic lights as well. Not only did some Rabbis try to mitigate Saul’s failings on the basis of mistakes in halakhah, but they portrayed him as a devotee of sages as well. Thus, when the Mishnah (Nedarim 9:10) compares the lamentation
prescribed by David for the women over Saul, “Ye daughters of Israel, weep over Saul, who clothed you in scarlet delicately” (II Samuel 1:24), the discussion in the Yerushalmi to that text is:

Hama said: Banot Yisrael (daughters o f Israel) – Bena’ot yisrael (the beautiful o f Israel)
– that is the Sanhedrin, for when he would see a group o f scholars, he would wine and
dine them. What does the text mean, “Who put ornaments of gold upon your apparel”?
That means he would listen to the lessons o f the sage and praise him. The text, in the
names o f Rav Judah and Rav Nehemiah, also compares Saul to Rav Ishmael for his
generosity, by feeding the wives o f his soldiers.

The text of Yoma 22b, which contains the extended discussion on Saul
mentioned earlier, provides an example of the Rabbis giving Saul the attri­bute of near perfection:

Said Rav Huna, “Saul was a year when he became King” (I Samuel 13:1). That means
that he never tasted the taste o f sin (like a one year old child). Rav Nachman bar Yitzhak
disagreed: “He was like your child, muddied and soiled with excrement. That night he
saw a frightening apparition in his dream, and he declared, I have disturbed the bones
o f Saul the son of Kish.The apparition returned, until he declared, I have disturbed the
bones o f Saul, the son of Kish, king of Israel!’”18

Saul is ultimately redeemed, in Rabbinic lore, by being elevated to the
greatest honor possible, to eschatological function and a place in the presence
of God. Saul is seated in the company of the Messiah and made a heavenly
defender of Israel. Thus, Rav Sheshet and Hannah bar Bisna in the name of
Rav Shimon Hasida said:

“We will set up over it seven shepherds, eight princes o f men” (Micah 5:4). Who are the
seven shepherds? David in the middle, Adam, Seth, Methuselah on the right, Abraham,
Jacob, Moses on the left. Who are the eight princes? Jesse, Saul, Samuel, Amos,
Zephaniah, Zedekiah, Messiah, Elijah. (Sukkot 52b)19

The ultimate reconciliation is effected; Saul is not only in the same row
with the Messiah, but is seated next to David’s father, Jesse, on one side, and
with Samuel, who had bemoaned Saul’s failings, on the other.

Concluding Thoughts
It is part and parcel of Rabbinic homiletics to use the figures of the Bible for
didactic ends, even though the plain meaning of the text may suffer. They
projected contemporary issues into the past, as recorded in the Bible. In
addition, there is a strong tendency in Rabbinic teaching to elevate the status
of all figures in the Bible, in line with the concept, “If our ancestors were like
angels, then we are mere mortals; if our ancestors were mere mortals, then
we are monkeys.’’ The methods and motivations are underscored in
Darkei Aggadah by Heinemann.20

It is from this perspective that it is possible to understand the radical
differences in approach of the Midrash to that of earlier works. The literature
of the Second Temple period varies from being highly critical and negative, as
in Enoch, to an attempt to understand why Saul failed, as in the works of
Josephus. These works appear as extended discourse on a theme, written as
narrative, apocalypse, or wisdom literature. Though reflecting the methods
developed centuries earlier, we find in the works recorded following the fall
of the Second Temple not only the sharp criticism but a benefit of the doubt
and even an acquittal of soul, something that is possible when, in midrashic
approach, the text becomes merely the starting point and no longer the
definite authority.

There is only one text that stands out in contrast to the favorable
pronouncements which seem to predominate in later years, and that is in the
Tanna d’bei Eliahu.

The work is radically different from the literature commonly found during this period; it reflects, in its style, a return to the extended discourse upon themes, characteristic of a Ben Sira, for example,
rather than verse by verse explication. It is only here that Saul is villified in the manner of Enoch or Pseudo-Philo. Saul is included in a discussion of those to be punished in this world and the next, after Ahitophel, the genera­tions of the flood, the people of Sodom, Sanherib and Pharaoh:

And Saul displayed crass behavior. Therefore, he was killed and the royalty taken from
him. . . . He kept jealousy in his heart and poured out vengeance upon Israel on account
o f David . . . what he was not commanded to do, he did, and what he was commanded to
do, he did it not . . . he spared Agag and slaughtered the priests of Nob . . . he was
careless in causing adultery, to give Michal, Davids wife, to Paltiel ben Laish, and
inquired o f the spirit, and repeatedly caused abominations in Israel. Therefore, he was
killed and the throne of Israel taken from him (Tanna d’bei Eliahu Rabbah, chapter 31,
Warsaw ed., chapter 21, ish Shalom ed.)21

Only Saul s sins are recorded, and he is ranked in the same list, not with
the eight princes in heaven of the Talmud, but with those who are recorded
in Midrash Sanhédrin 11 as having no place in the world to come and with the
great enemies of Israel, Pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar, who also have no
share in the world to come (Shabbat 146b); Saul, too, by implication, is in the
nether world.

Which image of Saul became the acceptable one in later generations? I remember, as a child, being taught in yeshivah that the only person who came close to being perfect was Saul. He had committed only one sin. Today,it would be well to reopen the case of Saul and review the rise and fall of a
national leader. Knowing his strengths and shortcomings, we should reinter­pret
the character to fit the intricacies of modern parliamentary politics.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Democracy, Elections, Brexit on the 4thof July- A Perspective from 90 Years Ago

Democracy, Elections, Brexit on the 4thof July- A Perspective from 90 Years Ago

My father’s Doctorate on the Collapse of Parliamentary Democracy, signed by the future Cardinal of Vienna, Innitzer.

Follow the link for the full text of the thesis
Based on the passage in my book, Courage of the Spirit. Available at Amazon

This Shabbat, in our Torah reading, we have an uprising against the leadership of Moses and Aaron by the CIA. Yes, the old version. Moses sends twelve spies to scout the land of Israel and he gets the ” Majority Report”- A land that devours its inhabitants, a land of giants that make us look like grasshoppers!
Next week, we have an uprising from within the ruling party- within the Levites- the Korach faction, allied with the Reuben party.
The first uprising is met with a change of fate—the people are doomed by the report itself to wander for 40 years, until they have developed the guts to take on the giants, who seemed to have vanished.
The second uprising is put down by earthshaking force-an earthquake followed by divine fire. Moses himself does not put down the rebellion—God does it. Many years later, the Bolsheviks would perfect the massive suppression of any questions of leadership by terrorism. I will talk later about my father, but just mention that he asked one of his friends, Mannes Sperber, an active young leader of the communists in Austria, how he could justify the purges under Lenin and Stalin. His friend answered matter of factly, “Look at what Moses did to Korach.”
Here we are, just before the 4th of July, and we have the threats of a loss of faith in leadership.
Anyone who watches the developments in the UK, with the Brexit vote, this last week, must surely be concerned, for of all the Europeans, the British are the closest in mentality to the Americans. It is for a great number of historical reasons, beginning with some loyal subjects of the Crown who thought the king, of German heritage, did not understand his own people. There is something of a shared concern here, as we have gone through a contentious primary campaign of both parties. We all know that as soon as the vote was announced, the stock market fell and the sky fell as well; fortunately, some voices were heard, such as Kissinger, telling us it won’t be so bad. Bad- but not so bad!
The Brexiters, the Trumpkins, the Sanderistas, for all that the issues are different, are the same in one thing. Pundits would like us to believe it is only “country-bumpkins,” “racists”, “people looking for a free hand out” who voted as they did. That is a dangerous misreading.
These divergent people all share one thing in common. They don’t trust the leadership.That is the key factor.
The spies as well Korach and his fellow travelers created a situation of distrust in the leadership of Moses. Moses was lucky—God was on his side and that was the end of the uprising. Neither we nor the Brits have that guarantee.We don’t expect a plague to strike down the rebels nor the earth to open up.
I bring this up because our civilization, Western, democratic, rests upon trust. There has to be trust of each other as citizens and trust in the representatives who have to manage our communal lives on our behalf.
I mentioned my father and his communist friend. We forget that in those days, 80 and 90 years ago, to be hip, to be with it, you were in one of two extremes—communist or fascist. Much of the trends of those days repeat themselves in later generations. For example, I thought being a hippy was new. No—it was just a copy of the German youth cult of his day. I thought that Herman Hesse was the hot book. No—it was the book that inspired the German youth in his day. And so forth.
The terrorism we saw in Florida and in Ankara? If we look back at history, we know these are nothing new. These were tools started in the French Revolution, endorsed by Marx, and perfected by Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin. It is not the fall back of some primitive know-nothings, but the tools of the vanguard of history. Media savvy? Social networking? Hitler was a master of staged spectacles and had the best film-maker of his day to create a masterpiece documentary.
Back to my father, the future rabbi Dr. Wihelm( William )Weinberg. He was a young, fresh doctoral candidate at the University of Vienna, just 90 years ago, 1926, when he wrote his dissertation. It is so appropriate for us on July 4th, 2016.
Keep in mind that when he first typed his thesis, Hitler had just recently come out of prison and had not had one decent electoral victory. It was the Goldene Zwanziger- Golden Twenties- for the Weimar Republic. The Roaring Twenties for the US, and the world economy was solid. For the most part, Woodrow Wilson had succeeded in his goal: “The world must be made safe for democracy.”
The only exceptions at the time were Fascist Italy under Mussolini and the Communist Soviet Union under Lenin. Elsewhere, democracy was safe—or so it seemed to everyone– but not to the young student of political science, William Weinberg. He was just 25 when he typed his thesis, Parliamentarism: System and Crisis.
He introduced his paper with the pronouncement of how deeply rooted the parliamentary democratic system is imbedded in Europe.
“Parliamentary Idea”, that the people of a nation choose, and, wherever direct rule is not possible, then at the minimum, the people have a marked influence on the manner and the norms by which it will be ruled; it is carried out in the leadership of the State through the representatives. It is a very ancient concept. Ancient representative councils were described in antiquity not only in Greece, but in Rome and Germany as well.
He continues in his thesis to describe the history of the Parliamentary system in medieval England, France, and other European states, down to the forms it took in the 19th and early 20th century.
Now, the thesis comes to its crux- if parliamentary democracy is the chosen form of government, what has happened to it?
He continued:
In the past 200 years, the Parliamentary system has become the standard form of political life in the civilized world. All the great political struggles of modern times have as their goals the shaping of Parliament. The Parliamentary system attacked and broke monarchy; it is identical with the victory of Democracy—Freedom, the rule of the people in all lands.
We are so proud of the result of the creation of our modern culture and we have become accustomed to see in the parliamentary system the last word in political culture, so that we have hardly recognized that it has begun to degenerate, that it is losing its original purpose. We have come to this time, when the parliamentary system has become the topic of debate, in which its flaws are widely known, and the whole world is speaking of a crisis of the parliamentary system.
The signs of this crisis can be found in all European states, not only Italy and Russia, …. We have in mind those countries with strong parliamentary constitutions—France, England, Germany, and the smaller states. Overall we find an inability of the parliamentary system to guarantee a proper and stable leadership and create a good and lasting government and provide a beneficial and orderly administration.
. . . there has been an all around failure of belief in the system. … they have become disillusioned and mistrusting and seek other forms of political leadership. The idea of a dictator is today popular in many European states. Parliamentary rule is evermore unpopular; its existence is in danger. Many political thinkers, historians, and philosophers of history see its imminent demise. “

What are the causes of the crisis? It goes back to the two core principals which inevitably conflict:
“The parliamentary system has two key foundations. The first foundation is the principal of democracy: the people alone determine their own fate. The second foundation is the principal of representation. Since it is impossible for each citizen to directly and constantly involved with all political questions, he chooses a representative who makes decisions on his behalf.
Parliamentarism is therefore a representative democracy yet it is this very principal of representation that bears danger form its beginning.
These prophecies by the theoreticians of modern democracy have correctly predicted: the more that the parliamentary system has developed, and the greater the State has become, so richer and complicated has become the political life, so that more and more, the Parliament becomes independent, absolute, and unaccountable to the people, a world to itself.
Politics has become a science with its unique discipline, methods and secrets. Today, it is so complicated and twisted, that the common man, with average reasoning ability, cannot find his way in it.
The politician becomes a new creation. He is no longer the representative of his thousands of fellow citizens, no longer the fighter and the spokesperson for the others.
He is rather a man for whom politics is his profession, who has become an expert in the wisdom and secrets of the hidden science of politics.
It must also be added that the legal framework today is no longer managed by the parliament; instead it has become completely a matter of the state bureaucracy. This happens because of the degree of knowledge and expertise that is necessary to shape a law today.
Increasingly, the politician loses the common interest of his constituents; less and less does politics arise from the realistic needs and wants of the people.
The parliament has ceased to be a suitable apparatus for dealing with the public good, resting on the broadest foundation; it stands upon artful electioneering mathematics. These delegates no longer represent the people against the State authority and its bureaucracy and no longer adopt policies necessary for civil life; they fail to act as a vent for individual initiative and freedom of the soul. The delegates legislative effectiveness is identified with the will of the state and its political activity and his attachment is to the party organization.
It is no wonder that the people are disappointed and indifferent to parliament, to the parliamentary politics, which then loses their loyalty.
Therefore, in different countries people are looking for a new political form to inherit the role of the parliamentary system. In Europe, there are now two such systems: Fascism in Italy and Sovietism in Russia.”
He finished up his dissertation with some ideas for improving the European systems to better reflect the voice of the people. As I said, he started it in 1926, 90 years ago. In 1928 he received his doctorate, and the signature on the diploma is of the Rector of the University, Theodore Innitzer. Exactly ten years later, as Cardinal Innitzer, he welcomed Hitler into Vienna because, as he saw it, government had collapsed.
It would be facile to equate what we have today with what was happening in the 1920’s and 30’s. Nevertheless, we need to recognize that our system of government is very delicate. I must admit that I find trends on the far left and in the academic left that remind me of tactics of a century ago; it is more worrisome because it is supported by tuition from wealthy parents paying $50,000 a year. It is may be just as dangerous as the tactics of the far right, or more so.
Our key concern still must be representatives who listen, and who are open, transparent, so that we can regain faith in our system. We need representatives who can reach across their lines of supporters and talk to the needs of the people who vote against them. We can’t have our leaders putting spins on things, so that failed policies are paraded as successes, or that one position is put forward to the public, while actual policies create the opposite results.
On this 4th of July, we pray that we can continue this nation on its path, believing whole-heartedly that:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

Khan, Makin, ‘The Tibetan Pilgrim, Urgyan-Pa, also passed through Swat valley in 1250AD’ in Archaeological Museum Saidu Sharif, Swat: A Guide, Saidu Sharif, 1997.

Kush ben yamini seeds

Introduction & General Bibliography

Ahmed, Feroz, Ethnicity and Politics in Pakistan, Karachi, 1999.

Ahsan, Aitzaz, The Indus Saga and the Making of Pakistan, Karachi, 1997.

Ali, Mubarak, In the Shadow of History, Lahore, 1998.

Anam, Tahmima, A Golden Age, London, 2007.

Aslam, Talat, ‘“The water agreement is really a con job” – Arif Hasan’, in The Herald, Karachi, April 1991.

Astill, James, A survey of Pakistan [Economist Special Report], London, 6 July 2006.

Bennett Jones, Owen, Pakistan: Eye of the Storm, New Haven/London, 2002.

Burney, I.H., No Illusions, Some Hopes and No Fears: The Outlook Editorials of IH Burney 1962-4; 1972-4, Karachi, 1996.

Collins, Larry & Dominique Lapierre, Mountbatten and the Partition of India: Volume 1: March 22-August 15, 1947, Delhi, 1982.

Daniel, Lynn, ed., South Asia 2004, London, 2003.

Dawood, N.J., The Koran, tr., London, 2003 [1956].

Duncan, Emma, Breaking the Curfew: a political journey through Pakistan, London, 1989.

Faiz, Faiz Ahmed, Poems by Faiz, tr. V.G. Kiernan, New Delhi, 2004 [1971].

Jahangir, Asma & Mehro Siddiqui, From Protection to Exploitation (the laws against blasphemy in Pakistan), Lahore, [n.d. c. 2003?].

Keay, John, India: a history, London, 2000.

Lamb, Christina, Waiting for Allah: Pakistan’s struggle for democracy, London, 1991.

Lévy, Bernard-Henri, Who Killed Daniel Pearl?, Hoboken (NJ), 2003.

Mahmood, M., The Major Acts: With lots of improvements, case law rearranged under appropriate headings and sub-headings, Lahore, 2001.

Mishra, Pankaj, Temptations of the West: How to be Modern in India, Pakistan, Tibet and beyond, New York, 2006.

Naipaul, V.S., Among the Believers: an Islamic journey, London, 1981;
Beyond Belief: Islamic excursions among the converted peoples, London, 1998.

Quraeshi, Samina, Legacy of the Indus: A Discovery of Pakistan, New York, 1974.

Qur’an, The Holy Qur’an, tr. M.H. Shakir, University of Virginia Electronic Text Center, 1997:

Rashid, Salman, Riders on the Wind: Travels Through Pakistan, Lahore, 1992.

Rushdie, Salman, Shame, London, 1983.

Said, Edward, Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World, New York, 1997 [1981].

Shah, Hassam Qadir [for Shirkat Gah], There is no ‘honour’ in killing: Don’t let them get away with murder (Booklet on criminal procedures), Basic questions answered, Lahore, 2002.

Shamsie, Kamila, In the city by the sea, London, 1998;
Kartography, London, 2002.

Sharwani, Iftikar, Women and Quranic Injunctions, Lahore, 2003.

Talbot, Ian, Pakistan: A Modern History, London, 1998.

The Guardian, London.

Weaver, Mary-Anne, Pakistan: In the Shadow of Jihad and Afghanistan, New York, 2002.

Ziring, Lawrence, Pakistan in the Twentieth Century: A Political History, Karachi, 1997.

Afzal, M. Rafique, ed., Selected Speeches and Statements of the Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah [1911-34 and 1947-48], Lahore, 1976 [1966].

Anand, Subhadra, National Integration of Sindhis, New Delhi, 1996.

Aitken, E.A., Gazetteer of the Province of Sind, Karachi, 1907.

Baillie, Alexander, Kurrachee: Past, Present and Future, Calcutta, 1890.

Bolitho, Hector, Jinnah: Creator of Pakistan, London, 1954.

Bryant, Edwin, The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate,
Oxford/New York, 2001.

Burton, Richard, Scinde: Or the Unhappy Valley, London, 1851;
Sind Revisited: With Notices of the Anglo-Indian Army; Railroads; Part, Present, and Future, Etc., London, 1877.

Cheesman, David, ‘The Omnipresent Bania: Rural Moneylenders in Nineteenth-Century Sind’, Modern Asian Studies, Cambridge, 1982 (XVI:3).

Collins, Larry & Dominique Lapierre, Mountbatten and the Partition of India: Volume 1: March 22-August 15, 1947, Delhi, 1982.

Dawn, founded by M.A. Jinnah, New Delhi (later Karachi), 1946-

Feldman, Herbert, Karachi through a Hundred Years: The Centenary History of the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry 1860-1960, Karachi, 1960.

Defence Journal, Karachi,

Guha, Ramachandra, ‘Could Partition have been made less bloody?’, in The Hindu: Magazine, Chennai, 28/08/2005.

Hotchand, Seth Naomal, A forgotten chapter of Indian history as described in the memoirs of Seth Naomal Hotchand, Karachi, 1982 [1915].

Haleem, Muhammad Abdel, Understanding the Qur’an: Themes and Style, London, 1999.

Hasan, Arif, ‘A Pedestrian’s Saddar’ in The Herald, July 1986;
‘Karachi’s Disappearing Troughs’ in The Herald, September 1986;
‘The Changing Face of Karachi: Special Report’ in The Herald, Karachi, February 1993;
Understanding Karachi: Planning and Reform for the Future, Karachi, 1999;
‘The changing nature of the informal sector in Karachi as a result of global restructuring and liberalization’ in Environment & Urbanization, London, April 2002 (XIV:1, pp.69-78).

Hasan, Mushirul, ed., India Partitioned: The Other Face of Freedom, New Delhi, 1995; ‘The Partition Debate – II’ in The Hindu, Chennai, 3/01/2002.

Hughes, A.W., A Gazetteer of the Province of Sindh, London, 1874.

Hyder, S., Progress of Pakistan, Lahore, 1947.

India, [Republic of], Report of the Bengal Boundary Commission, Report of the Punjab Boundary Commission, New Delhi, 1947.

Jinnah, M.A., Speeches and Statements 1947 – 1948, Karachi, 2000.

Jotwani, Motilal, Sufis of Sindh, Delhi, 1986.

Khan, Adeel, Politics of Identity: Ethnic Nationalism and the State in Pakistan, New Delhi/London, 2005.

Khuhro, Hamida, Sind Through the Centuries, Karachi, 1981;
Mohammed Ayub Khuhro: A Life of Courage in Politics, Lahore, 1998a.

Kirpalani, S.K., Fifty Years with the British, London, 1993.

Lari, Yasmeen & Mihail S., The Dual City: Karachi During the Raj, Karachi, 1996.

Lawrence, Bruce, The Qur’an: A Biography, London, 2006.

Mansergh, Nicholas, ed., Transfer of Power: The Mountbatten Viceroyalty, London, 1982.

Manto, Sa‘adat Hasan, For Freedom’s Sake: Selected Stories and Sketches, Karachi, 2001.

Markovits, Claude, The Global World of Indian Merchants, 1750-1947. Traders of Sind from Bukhara to Panama, Cambridge, 2000.

Maududi, S. Abul A’la, Fundamentals of Islam, Lahore, 2002 [first English edition 1974].

Menon, V.P., The Transfer of Power in India, Delhi, 1979 [1957].

Merz Rendel Vatten (Pakistan), Report on Greater Karachi Plan, Stockholm, 1952.

Michel, Aloys, The Indus Rivers: A Study of the Effects of Partition, New Haven/London, 1967.

Moon, Penderel, Wavell: The Viceroy’s Journal, London, 1973; Divide and Quit: An Eyewitness Account of the Partition of India, Delhi, 1998. [1961].

Mosley, Leonard, The Last Days of the British Raj, London, 1962.

Mountbatten, Louis, ‘Viceroy’s Personal Report No.17. Plus Appendix I: Summary of the Award of the Punjab and Bengal Boundary Commission and the Radcliffe Report’, 16th August 1947, [Listowel Collection, India Office Records, British Library: L/PO/6/123].

Nehru, Jawaharlal, Jawaharlal Nehru’s Speeches: September 1946-May 1949, Delhi, 1958 [1949]; Toward Freedom, New York, 1961.

Orangi Pilot Project, ‘Karachi map showing documented Natural Nalas & Drains’, Karachi, 2004a;
‘Orangi Pilot Project Institutions and Programs: 99th Quarterly Report’, July-September 2004b;
‘Orangi Pilot Project – Research & Training Institute (OPP-RTI) Update, November 2004c.

Pakistan, Islamic Republic of, ‘Essential Personnel (Registration) Ordinance 1948’, Gazette of Pakistan, Karachi, 1948;
District Census Report: Karachi Central, Karachi, 1998.

Pandey, Deepak, ‘Congress-Muslim League Relations 1937-39; The Parting of the Ways’, in Modern Asian Studies, Cambridge, 1978 (XII: 4).

Pandey, Gyanendra, ‘India and Pakistan, 1947-2002: Statistics and Their Meaning’ in Economic and Political Weekly, Mumbai, 16/03/2002 (XXXVII:11),

Prakasa, Sri, Pakistan: Birth and Early Days, Meerut/Delhi, 1965.

Qureshi, Saleem, Jinnah the Founder of Pakistan, Karachi, 1998.

Rahman, Perween, Katchi Abadis of Karachi: A survey of 334 katchi abadis; existing situation, problems and solutions related to sewage disposal, water supply, health and education, Karachi, 2004.

Raipuri, Hameeda Akhtar Husain, My Fellow Traveller, Karachi, 2006.

Rodinson, Maxime, Mohammed, tr. Anne Carter, London, 1971.

Sarkar, Sumit, Modern India: 1885-1947, Delhi, 1985 [1983].

Schimmel, Annemarie, Pearls from the Indus, Jamshoro (Pakistan), 1986.

Shaikh, Farzana, ‘Muslims and Political Representation in Colonial India: The Making of Pakistan’, in Modern Asian Studies, Cambridge, 1986 (XX: 3).

Shamsie, Muneeza, ed., Leaving Home, Karachi, 2001.

Sharma, M.S.M., Peeps into Pakistan, Patna, 1954.

Sher, Karamat, ‘Neighbourhood: Indo-Pak Relations’ [self-published pamphlet], tr. A.F. Chaudhry, Karachi, n.d.

Siddiqui, Ahmed Husain, Karachi: The Pearl of the Arabian Sea, Karachi, 1996.

Streefland, Pieter, The Sweepers of Slaughterhouse: Conflict and Survival in a Karachi Neighbourhood, Assen, The Netherlands, 1979.

Suleri, Ziauddin Ahmad, Whither Pakistan?, London, 1949.

The Times, London, 13/09/1948 [Obituary of M.A. Jinnah].

Urban Resource Centre, Karachi:

Verkaaik, Oskar, A People of Migrants: Ethnicity, State and Religion in Karachi, Amsterdam, 1994.

Wolpert, Stanley, Jinnah of Pakistan, New York/Oxford, 1984.

Zafar, M.D., Pakistan Studies: For F.A. F.S.C. & Commerce, Lahore, 1987.

Zaidi, Z.H., ed., Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah Papers, Islamabad, 10 vols, 1993-;
Pakistan: Struggling for Survival, 1 January – 30 September 1948 [Jinnah Papers], 2002, (VII).

Ziring, Lawrence, Pakistan in the Twentieth Century: A Political History, Karachi, 1997.

Aijazuddin, F.S., Historical Images of Pakistan, Lahore, 1996 [1992].

Ali, Mubarak, The English Factory in Sind: Extracts Regarding Sind from William Foster’s “The English Factories in India”, Jamshoro, Pakistan, 1983.

Ahmed, Muzammil, ‘Animal and Plant Communities of the Present and Former Indus Delta’ in The Indus River: Biodiversity, Resources, Humankind, Azra Meadows and Peter S. Meadows, eds, Karachi, 1999, pp.12-30.

Aitken, E.A., Gazetteer of the Province of Sind, A, 1907, p.142.

Andrew, W.P., The Punjaub Railway. A Selection from the Official Correspondence Regarding the Introduction of Railways into the Punjaub, London, 1857;
On the Establishment of a Flotilla of Steam Vessels, of Improved Construction, on the Indus, in connection with the Scinde and Punjaub Railways, London, 1857;
The Indus and Its Provinces, Their Political and Commercial Importance Considered in Connexion with Improved Means of Communication, London, 1859;
On the completion of the Railway System of the Valley of the Indus: A letter to his Grace the Duke of Argyll (Secretary of State for India in Council), London, 1869.

Anon [by a Bengal Officer], Recollections of the First Campaign West of the Indus, and of the Subsequent Operations of the Candahar Force under Major-General Sir W. Nott, London, 1845.

Anon, The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, tr. Wilfred Schoff, New York, 1912.

Anon [by an Indian Officer], The Navigation of the Indus and Railways in Scinde and the Punjaub. A Letter to the Court of Directors of the Honourable East India Company Showing the Impolicy of Granting a Guarantee for the Navigation of the Indus, as Virtually Creating a Monopoly of Such Navigation, London, 1858.

Anon [by an Indian Officer], The Route of the Indus, and the Advance of Russia Towards India: A Letter to W.P.Andrew, Esq. On the Importance of Placing Delhi and Lahore in Railway Communication with Kurrachee on the Arabian Sea, London, 1865.

Arain, Muhammad Rafi & M.Y. Khuhawar, Water Scarcity in Sindh, Jamshoro (Pakistan), 2004.

Auckland, ‘Minute Books: containing minutes and observations of Lord Auckland based on reports and letters of various committees and political agents’, Calcutta, 1836 [European Manuscripts Collection, British Library: Add.37709].

Bablani, Saeed Ahmed & Saeed Ahmed Soomro, ‘Investigation of seawater intrusions in the left bank sediment of southern Sindh’ in Proceedings of the third National Seminar on Drainage in Pakistan, Peshawar, June 2004.

Beddoes, Alexander, On Alexander’s Expedition down the Hydaspes & the Indus to the Indian Ocean, London, 1792.

Bell, Evans, The Oxus and the Indus, London, 1874.

Bellew, Henry, From the Indus to the Tigris, London, 1874.

Bernier, François, Travels in the Mogul Empire AD 1656-1668, tr. Archibald Constable, Delhi, 1934 (rpt 1999).

Boileau, A.H.E., Personal Narrative of a Tour Through the Western States of Rajwara, in 1835; Comprising Beerkaner, Jesulmeer, and Jodhpoor, With the Passage of the Great Desert, and A Brief Visit to the Indus and to Buhawulpoor; Accompanied by Various Tables and Memoranda Statistical, Philological, and Geographical, [Bengal Engineers, First Assistant, Great Trigonometrical Survey], Calcutta, 1837.

Bombay Government, Handbook for Passengers from Bombay to Mooltan, Via Kurrachee, Kotree, and Sukkur, By the Steamers of The Bombay Steam Navigation Company, and Steamers of the Indus Flotilla, Bombay, 1861.

Britain, Government of, Foreign Office: General Correspondence from Political and Other Departments, ‘Indus Waters Dispute’, [National Archives, London: FO 371/92893], 1951;
Dominions Office and Commonwealth Relations Office, ‘Indus Rivers waters dispute and danger of war between India and Pakistan’, [National Archives, London: DO 35/6648], 1952-53.

Burnes, Alexander, ‘The Journal of Alexander Burnes. being a diary of a reconnaissance trip up the River Indus’ [India Office, British Library: MssEurF208/112], 1827;
‘A Memoir and Supplementary Memoir of a Map of the Eastern Branch of the Indus by Lt Alexander Burnes’ [India Office, British Library: MssEurF208/111], 1827-8;
‘A Memoir of a Map of the Eastern Branch of the Indus giving an account of the alterations produced in it by the earthquake of 1819. and a paper on the Eunuchs or Pawyuns of Cutch’, [India Office, British Library: MssEurK396-7 (D155)], 1827-9;
‘Portfolio containing the following papers: (1) Memoir on the Indus and Punjab Rivers with cursory remarks on the people, by Lieutenant Alexander Burnes; (2) Extracts from the above (3) Extracts from Burnes’ narrative and journal; (4) Notes on Burnes’ narrative’, [Dalhousie Muniments, National Archives of Scotland: GD45/5/80], 1831;
‘Copies of letter from Captain Burnes to Major-General Ramsay concerning the meeting between Ranjit Singh and the Governor-General at Rupar’, 31 October 1831, ‘With annotated sketches of Ranjit’s tented enclosure at the Sutlej and letter’, 1834, [Dalhousie Muniments, National Archives of Scotland: GD45/5/72], 1831-4;
Travels in Bokhara: Together with Narrative of A Voyage on the Indus, London, 1834;
‘Two letters from Lt-Col Sir Alexander Burnes. (i) dated c.1833 concerning his book Travels in Bokhara. (ii) dated c1840, on the probity of Rahan Dil a merchant of Kabul’, [India Office, British Library: MssEurB256], 1833-40;
Holograph Letter written by Capt. Alexander Burnes, 21st Bombay Native Infantry, from ‘On the Indus above Moultan’ to H.E. John McNeil Minister at the Court of Persia, dated 6th June 1837 [Mss Eur D 1165/2], 1837;
‘Letters to McNeil in Persia’, November 1837 – March 1838 [National Archives of Scotland: GD371/138/2], 1837-8a;
‘Copy of letter from Capt. Alexander Burnes to Lord Auckland; copies of despatches from Burnes to William Hay Macnaghten. two replies from latter to Burnes’, 1837-8 [India Office, British Library: MssEurD1165/13], 1837-8b;
1842: Cabool: Being a Narrative of a Journey to, and Residence in that City in the years 1836, 7, and 8, London, 1842.

Burnes, James A Narrative of a Visit to the Court of the Ameers of Sinde, Edinburgh, 1831;
‘Letter by James Burnes on the death of his brother’, [Wellesley Papers, European Manuscripts Collection, British Library: Add.37313, Series II, Volume XL], 1842;
Correspondence with Lord Palmerston, London, 1861.

Burton, Richard & J.E. Stocks, ‘Brief notes relative to the division of time, and articles of cultivation in Sind. and remarks on the modes of intoxication in that province’, [Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, New Series, India Office Records, British Library: Fiche no. 1069], 1848;
‘Notes relative to the population of Sind; and the customs, language, and literature of the people etc.’, [Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, New Series, India Office Records, British Library: Fiche no.1069-70], 1848;
Sindh and the Races that Inhabit the Valley of the Indus: with notices of the topography and history of the province, London, 1851;
Falconry in the Valley of the Indus, London, 1852;

Carless, T.G., ‘Memoir on the delta of the Indus’ and ‘Report upon portions of the River Indus’, [Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, New Series, India Office Records, British Library: V/23/214, Fiche no.1067-68], 1837.

Clarke, S.H., The Scinde Railway and Indus Flotilla Companies: Their Futility and Hollowness Demonstrated; in a Letter Addressed to the Right Honourable Lord Viscount Palmerston, London, 1858.

Conolly, Arthur, Journey to the north of India: overland from England, through Russia, Persia, and Affghaunistan, London, 1834.

Dalrymple, Alex, A Collection of Plans of Ports in the East Indies, London, 1782 [1774].

d’Anville, Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon, Éclaircissemens géographiques sur la carte de l’Inde, Paris, 1753;
A Geographical Illustration of the Map of India, tr. William Herbert, London, 1759;
Antiquité Géographique de l’Inde et de Plusieurs Autres Contreés de la Haute Asie, Paris, 1775.

de l’Hoste, E.P., ‘A Mission to Sinde’, [European Manuscripts Collection, British Library: Add.14382].

Duarte, Adrian, A History of British Relations with Sind 1613-1843, Karachi, 1976.

Durand, H.M., ‘Passage of the Indus by the Bengal portion of the Army of the Indus’, in Papers on Subjects Connected with the Duties of the Corps of Royal Engineers, London, 1840.

East India Company, ‘Treaties with Sinde’, [National Archives, London: PRO30/12/33/5], 1809-1838;
East-India Register and Directory, London, 1829;
‘Memoranda on the N.W. Frontier of British India and on the importance of the river Indus as connected with its defence, drawn up by the desire of Sir J Malcolm’, 1830 [European Manuscripts Collection, British Library: Add.21178], 1830;
Abstract of Proceedings Relative to the Trade and Navigation of the Indus, Since the Settlement of the Last Treaty Regarding That River, London, 1837;
‘Treaty with the Ameers of Sinde, 22nd August, 1809’, in Correspondence Relating to Persia and Affghanistan, London, 1839.

Edney, Matthew, 1997: Mapping an Empire, Chicago, 1997.

Ellis, F.S., A Lexical Concordance to the Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, London, 1892.

Elphinstone, Mountstuart, An Account of the Kingdom of Caubul, London, 1815;
The History of India. The Hindu and Mahometan Periods, London, 1857.

England, India Office Library: Catalogue of Manuscripts in European Languages, London, 1916-37, (II).

Fane, Henry, Five Years in India, London, 1842.

Forster, George, Sketches of the Mythology and Customs of the Hindoos, London, 1785;
A Journey from Bengal to England, London, 1798.

Foster, William, The English Factories in India 1634-1636, Oxford, 1911;
The English Factories in India 1637-41, Oxford, 1912;
ed., The Embassy of Sir Thomas Roe to India 1615-1619, As Narrated in his Journal and Correspondence, London, 1926.

Fowler, F.J., ‘Some Problems of Water Distribution between East and West Punjab’, The Geographical Review, New York, 1950 (XL, pp.583-599).

Fowler, John, Report on the Best Width for the Proposed Narrow Gauge Railways for India, and their Applicability to the Indus Valley, London, 1870.

Fox, Franklin, Frank Allreddy’s Fortune, Or, Life on the Indus, London, 1891.

Gazdar, Haris, ‘Baglihar and Politics of Water: A Historical Perspective from Pakistan’, Economic and Political Weekly, Mumbai, 26 February 2005.

Gerard, James Gilbert, ‘Letters to William Fraser from Dr. James Gilbert Gerard, Soobathoo, mainly on the writer’s survey of the Trans-Indus regions’, [Fraser Family of Reelig, National Register of Archives, Scotland: NRAS2696/ Bundle 339], 1834.

Greathed, H.H., Letters written during the Siege of Delhi, 1858.

Haig, M.R., The Indus Delta Country: A Memoir Chiefly on its Ancient Geography and History, London, 1894.

Halliburton, ‘Personal letters from Douglas Gordon Halyburton (Halliburton) of Pictur to John Frederick Gordon, his nephew, son of George, 9th Marquess of Huntly’, [National Archives of Scotland: GD312/46/1-22], 1826-36.

Hall, J.H.W., Scenes in A Soldier’s Life, London, 1848.

Hamilton, Alexander, A New Account of the East Indies, Edinburgh, 1727.

Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates, London, 1840 (LI).

Hasan, Arif, Understanding Karachi: Planning and Reform for the Future, Karachi, 1999;
The Unplanned Revolution: Observations on the Process of Socio-Economic Change in Pakistan, Karachi, 2002.

Heddle, J.F., ‘Memoir on the River Indus’, [Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, New Series, India Office Records, British Library: V/23/214, Fiche no. 1066-7], 1836.

Holdsworth, T.W.E. [with a Preface by A.H. Holdsworth], Campaign of the Indus: In A Series of Letters from an Officer of the Bombay Division, London, 1840.

Hough, W., A Narrative of the March and Operations of the Army of the Indus in the Expedition to Affghanistan in the Years 1838-1839, London, 1841.

Hughes, A.W., A Gazetteer of the Province of Sindh, London, 1874.

India, Government of, ‘Sinde: The Thur or Little Desert: A Sketch of the Runn and Countries Adjacent’; ‘Genealogical Tree of the Syuds of Roree and Bukkur; showing those mentioned by name in the Memoir (Numbers in accordance with the Genealogy registered in the Jageer Office)’; ‘Sketch shewing Localities of Tribes on the Upper Scinde, Signed B.H. Ellis, Assistant Commissioner’; ‘Sketch of the Town of Jerrick situated on the Right Bank of the River Indus’; ‘Route from Kelat to Sonmeanee’; ‘Sketch of the Branches of the Indus: As they are supposed to have existed 20 years ago (A.D. 1817)’; ‘Sketch of the Branches of the Indus: As they exist at present (A.D.1837)’, [India Office Records, British Library: V/23 / Fiche A28], 1837;
Collection of Papers Regarding the Course of the Indus and Especially its Eastern Mouth and the Branches falling into the Runn of Cutch, Calcutta, 1843.

Irrigation Department & Research Circle, ‘Diagrams for River Indus’, [National Archives, London: AY10/63], 1918-30.

Jackson, K.A., Views in Affghaunistaun, &c. &c. &c. from Sketches taken during the Campaign of the Army of the Indus, London, 1842.

Jacquemont, Victor, ‘Letters to William Fraser, mainly from Victor Jacquemont’, [Fraser Family of Reelig, National Register of Archives, Scotland: NRAS2696/ Bundle 346], 1824-1833.

Jervis, T.B., Review of a Narrative of the Campaign of the Army of the Indus in Sindh and Kabul in 1838, 1839 by R.H. Kennedy, Bombay, 1841.

Kaye, John, Memoir of Henry St.George Tucker, London, 1854;
Lives of Indian Officers: Illustrative of the History of the Civil and Military Services in India, London, 1867;
History of the War in Afghanistan, London, 1874.

Keay, John, The Honourable Company: History of the English East India Company, London, 1993 [1991].

Kerr, Ian, Building the Railways of the Raj: 1850-1900, Delhi, 1995.

Khuhro, Hamida, The Making of Modern Sind: British Policy and Social Change in the Nineteenth Century, Karachi, 1978.

Khuwaja, Karim, Indus Valley: Environmental & Deltaic Crises, n.p. Karachi?, 2002.

Lal, Mohan, Travels in the Panjab, Afghanistan, & Turkistan, to Balk, Bokhara, and Herat; and a Visit to Great Britain and Germany, London, 1846.

Lambrick, H.T., Sir Charles Napier and Sind, Oxford, 1952.

Laurie, William A., Memoir of James Burnes, Edinburgh, 1850.

‘Letters (with translations) from various Indian notables, including Ranjit Singh’, [Dalhousie Muniments, National Archives of Scotland: GD45/5/93], (nd).

Lilienthal, David E., ‘Another “Korea” in the Making?’, in Collier’s Magazine, New York, 4 August, 1951.

Literature on Line:

Love, John, A Serious Call respecting a Mission from Glasgow to the River Indus, Glasgow, 1826 [1820].

Malcolm, John, Sketch of the Political History of India, from the Introduction of Mr. Pitt’s Bill, A.D. 1784, to the present date, London, 1811;
Sketch of the Sikhs; A Singular Nation, Who Inhabit the Provinces of the Penjab, Situated Between the Rivers Jumna and Indus, London, 1812;
‘Extract of a letter from Major-General Sir John Malcolm G.C.’, [India Office, British Library: MssEurD153/17], 1820.

Marvell, Andrew, The Complete Poems, ed George de F. Lord, London, 1984.

Masson, Charles, Narrative of Various Journeys in Balochistan, Afghanistan, and the Panjab, Including a Residence in those Countries from 1826 to 1838, London, 1842.

Michel, Aloys, The Indus Rivers: A Study of the Effects of Partition, New Haven/London, 1967.

Napier Papers: ‘British Prospectus of North of India, Guzerat, and Indus Commercial Company’, [European Manuscripts Collection, British Library: Add.49115], 1843.

Napier, Charles, ‘Memorandum on Sind’ [1846], in ‘Correspondence concerning India’, [National Archives, London: PRO/30/12/14/5], 1845-58;
‘Memorandum by Sir Charles Napier on stream navigation of the Indus and Punjab rivers’, [Dalhousie Muniments, National Archives of Scotland: GD45/6/402], 24 July 1849.

Napier, W.F.P., The Conquest of Scinde, London, 1845;
The Life and Opinions of General Sir Charles James Napier, G.C.B., London, 1857.

Niaz, Anjum, ‘A watery grave for Napier’s ship’ in Star Weekend, Karachi, August 7 1986.

Oliver, R., ‘Papers regarding navigation of the Indus by Capt R. Oliver’, [India Office, British Library: MssEurF213/103], 1840-1.

Ollivant, Alfred, Old For-Ever: An Epic of Beyond the Indus, London, 1923.

Our Paper, ‘Kurrachee (and Scinde): OUR PAPER, published at Kurrachee every Tuesday and Friday morning’, [India Office, British Library: MssEurF208/117], 1867.

Outram, Captain James, Rough Notes of the Campaign in Sinde and Affghanistan in 1838-9: Being Extracts from a Personal Journal kept while on the staff of the Army of the Indus, Bombay, 1840.

Pakistan, Ministry of Industries, The Indus Basin Irrigation Water Dispute, [Lahore?], 1953.

Peel Papers, ‘General Correspondence of Sir Robert Peel, as First Lord of the Treasury (including alleged letter by Sir Henry Pottinger, condemning Lord Ellenborough’s treatment of the princes of Sind)’, [European Manuscripts Collection, British Library: Add.40538], 1844.

Postans, T., A Few Observations of the Increase of Commerce by Means of the River Indus, London, 1843;
Personal Observations on Sindh, London, 1843;
‘Memorandum relative to the trade in indigo carried on by the countries bordering on the Indus’, Bombay, [Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, New Series, India Office Records, British Library: V/23/213, Fiche no. 1066], 1855.

Pottinger, Henry, Travels in Beloochistan and Sinde, London, 1816;
‘Minute on province of Kutch’, ‘Minute on Scinde frontier’, [European Manuscripts Collection, British Library: Add.14375], 1829.
‘Exchange of letters between Charles Napier and Henry Pottinger… regarding the administration in Sind’, [National Archives, London: FO/705/36], 1844.

Rennell, James, An Account of the Ganges and Burrampooter Rivers, London, 1781;
Memoir of a Map of Hindoostan, London, 1783.

Roberston, William, The History of America, Dublin, 1777.

Ross, David, The Land of the Five Rivers and Sindh: Sketches Historical and Descriptive, London, 1883.

Sanghur, Aziz, ‘Pakistan’s fishermen cast around for a solution’, Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum, Karachi, >
‘Scindy Diary’, [Lambrick Collection, India Office, British Library: MssEurF208/106], 1 August 1762-31 July 1764.

Shah, Muhammed Ali, Fisherfolk: Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum Newsletter, Karachi.

Stirling, Edward, Some Consideration on the Political State of the Intermediate Countries between Persia and India, With reference to the Project of Russia marching an Army through them, London, 1835.

Sutherland, J., Cursory Observations on the Route from the N.W.P. to Upper Scinde, Illustrative of the Statistics and Geological Features of the Rivers Sutlej, Punjnud or Chena, and Scinde or Indus, Calcutta, 1844.

Tavernier, Jean-Baptiste, Les six voyages de Jean Baptiste Tavernier, tr. V. Ball, London, 1889 [Paris, 1676-77].

The Monthly Review, or Literary Journal, London, August 1834 (II:4); 1842.

The Spectator, London, 1834, 1842, 1843, 1844.

The Times, London, 1834, 1842, 1843, 1844, 1926, 1928, 1931.

Thapar, Romila, Narratives and the Making of History: two lectures, New Delhi, 2000.

Thompson, E. & G.T. Garratt, Rise and Fulfillment of British Rule in India, London, 1934.

Thornton, Edward, A Gazetteer of the Countries Adjacent to India on the North-West, London, 1844.

Vigne, G.T., Travels in Kashmir, Ladak, Iskardo, The Countries Adjoining the Mountain-Course of the Indus, and the Himalaya, North of the Punjab, London, 1842.

Vincent, William, The Voyage of Nearchus from the Indus to the Euphrates, London, 1797.

Wainwright, M.D. & Noel Matthews, A Guide to Western Manuscripts and Documents in the British Isles Relating to South and South East Asia, London, 1965.

Wells, Hardy, Scinde: Kurachee Harbour Improvements. Letter to H.Bartle Frere, Esq., Commissioner in Scinde, Kurachee [Karachi], 1853.

Wink, André, Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Vol I, Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam 7th-11th centuries, Oxford, 1999 [1990].

Wood, John, ‘Report upon the River Indus’, [Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, India Office Records, British Library: V/23/212, Fiche nos. 1068-9, A28-9], 1838a;
‘Chart of the Indus River from Mittun to Attock’, by Lieutenant J. Wood, Indian Navy, [India Office Records, British Library: V/23 / Fiche A29], 1838b;
A Personal Narrative of a Journey to the Source of the River Oxus by the Route of the Indus, Kabul and Badakhshan, London, 1841.

Ahmed, Feroz, ‘Africa on the Coast of Pakistan, in New Directions: The Howard University Magazine, Washington D.C., (XVI: 4, pp.22-31), October 1989.

Aravamudan, Srinivas, Tropicopolitans: Colonialism and Agency, 1688-1804, Durham, 1999.

Baillie, Alexander, Kurrachee: Past, Present and Future, Calcutta, 1890.

Baloch, N.A., Hosh Muhammad Qanbrani [booklet in English and Sindhi], Karachi, [1975].

Beachey, R.W., The Slave Trade of Eastern Africa, London, 1976.

Burton, Richard, ‘Notes relative to the population of Sind; and the customs, language, and literature of the people etc.’, [Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, New Series, India Office Records, British Library: Fiche no.1069-70], 1848;
Sindh, and the Races that Inhabit the Valley of the Indus, London, 1851;
Scinde: Or the Unhappy Valley, London, 1851;
Sind Revisited, 1877.

Catlin-Jairazbhoy, Amy & Edward A. Alpers, eds, Sidis and Scholars: Essays on African Indians, Trenton, NJ/Delhi, 2004.

Coverte, Robert, A true and almost incredible report, London, 1612.

During, Jean, ‘African Winds and Muslim Djinns. Trance, Healing, and Devotion in Baluchistan’, in Yearbook for Traditional Music, 1997 (XXIX, pp. 39-56).

Enthoven, R.E., Tribes and Castes of Bombay, Bombay, 1922 (III).

Freeman-Grenville, G.S.P., ‘The Sidi and Swahili’, Bulletin of the British Association of Orientalists, London, 1971 (VI, pp.3-18).

Friese, Kai, ‘The Aryan Handshake: Blood and Belonging in India’, Transition 83: An International Review, Durham, North Carolina, 2000 (IX: 3, pp.4-35).

Fryer, John, A new account of East-India and Persia, in eight letters, London, 1698.

Gibb, H.A.R., tr., Ibn Battuta: Travels in Asia and Africa 1325-1354, New Delhi, 2001 [1929].

Grose, John Henry, A Voyage to the East Indies, London, 1772.

Harris, Joseph E., The African Presence in Asia: Consequences of the East African Slave Trade, Evanston, 1971.

Hotchand, Seth Naomal, Memoirs, Karachi, 1982 [1915].

Jha, Vivekanand, ‘Stages in the History of Untouchables’, The Indian Historical Review, Delhi, July 1975 (II: 1, pp.14-31).

Lambrick, H.T., Sir Charles Napier and Sind, Oxford, 1952.

Lashari, Bakhshal, Disastrous Effects of Left Bank Outfall Drainage [LBOD] – A Mega Failure, Islamabad, 2003.

Muir, J., Original Sanskrit Texts on the Origin and Progress of the Religion and Institutions of India; Collected, Translated into English and Illustrated by Notes, London, 1860 (II).

Mussafir, Mmd Siddiq, Ghulami ain Azadi Ja Ibratnak Nazara, Hyderabad, 1952; Manazil Mussafir, Kuliyat Mussafir, Hyderabad, 1965 (2nd edition; text completed October 2 1952).

Naidu, Uthaya, ‘Bible of Aryan Invasions: 1500 BC – 1000 AD’,

Naipaul, V.S., India: A Million Mutinies Now, London, 1991 [1990].

Qamar et al, ‘Y-Chromosomal DNA Variation in Pakistan’, in American Journal of Human Genetics, 2002 (LXX: 5, pp.1107-1124).

Pankhurst, Richard & Shihan de Silva Jayasuriya, eds, The African diaspora in the Indian Ocean, Trenton, NJ, 2003.

Pollock, Sheldon, ‘Ramayana and Political Imagination in India’, The Journal of Asian Studies, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1993 (LII:2, pp.261-297).

Qureshi, Shujauddin, Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum (PFF) Annual Report 2004, Karachi, 2005.

Rodinson, Maxime, Mohammed, tr. Anne Carter, London, 1971.

Ross, E. Denison, An Arabic History of Gujarat, London, 1910-1928 (II).

Russell, William Howard, My Diary in India in the Year 1858-9, London, 1860.

Schimmel, Annemarie, ‘Turk and Hindu: A Poetical Image and its Application to Historical Fact’ in Speros Vryonis Jr., ed., Islam and Cultural Change in the Middle Ages, Wiesbaden, 1975.

Segal, Ronald, Islam’s Black Slaves: The History of Africa’s Other Black Diaspora, London, 2001.

Smith, Vincent, The Oxford History of India, Oxford, 1920.

Thornton, John, Africa and Africans in the Making of the Atlantic World, 1400-1680, Cambridge, 1992.

Titus, Paul, Marginality and Modernity, Karachi, 1997.

Toru, Miura & John Edward Philips, eds, Slave Elites in the Middle East and Africa, London, 2000.

Wink, André, Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Vol I, Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam 7th-11th centuries, Oxford, 1999 [1990].

Zerjal et al, ‘A Genetic Landscape Reshaped by Recent Events: Y-Chromosomal Insights into Central Asia’, in American Journal of Human Genetics, Chicago, 2002.

Abbas, Shemeem Burney, The Female Voice in Sufi Ritual: Devotional Practices of Pakistan and India, Austin, 2002.

Abbott, J., Sind: A Re-interpretation of the Unhappy Valley, London/New York, 1924.

Advani, Kalyan B., Shah Latif, Delhi, 1970.

Ahmad, Aziz, Studies in Islamic Culture in the Indian Environment, Oxford, 1964.

Aitken, E.A., Gazetteer of the Province of Sind, A, Karachi, 1907.

Ajwani, Hazarisingh Gurbuxsingh, A Short Account of the Rise and Growth of the Shri Sadhbella Tirath, Sukkur, Sukkur, 1924.

Akhund, Abdul Hamid, ed., Shah Abdul Latif, his Mystical Poetry, np [Pakistan], nd [c.1991].

Ali, Rabia, There is no ‘honour’ in killing: The Dark Side of ‘Honour’, Women Victims in Pakistan, Lahore, 2001.

Allana, Ghulam Ali, Folk Music of Sind, Jamshoro, 1982.

Ansari, Sarah F.D., Sufi Saints and State Power: the pirs of Sind, 1843-1947, Cambridge, 1992.

Anti-Slavery International, This menace of bonded labour: debt bondage in Pakistan, [London], 1997;, 2002.

Arberry, A.J., tr., The Doctrine of the Sufis (Kitab al-Ta’arruf li-madhhab ahl al-tasawwuf. Translated from the Arabic of Abu Bakr al-Kalabadhi, Lahore, 2001 [1935]; Muslim Saints and Mystics: Episodes from the Tadhkirat al-Auliya’ (“Memorial of the Saints”) by Farid al-Din Attar, London, 1979 [1966].

Aurat Foundation, Suggestions for Women’s Empowerment, Islamabad, 2002a;
Manifesto Suggestions for Women’s Empowerment (for Political Parties), Lahore, 2002b.

Baloch, Shargil, Ki Jana Mai Kaun [documentary film produced by Action Aid], Karachi, 2004.

Bhatti, Rasheed, Birth of a Great Poet (Kalhora Period 1700-1784), Hyderabad, 2002.

Burnes, Alexander, Travels in Bokhara, Karachi, 1973 [1834].

Burton, Richard F., Sindh and the Races that Inhabit the Valley of the Indus, London, 1851; Sind Revisited: With Notices of The Anglo-Indian Army; Railroads; Past, Present, and Future, Etc., London, 1877.

Bux, Sufi Huzoor, ‘Shah Inayat Shaheed’ [monograph in Sindhi], Mirpur Bathoro, 1981.

Carter, G.E.L., ‘Religion in Sind’, in The Indian Antiquary, Bombay, September 1917 (XLVI).

Coomaraswamy, Ananda, A New Approach to the Vedas: An Essay in Translation and Exegesis, London, 1933.

Cousens, Henry, in Progress Report of the Archaeological Survey of Western India, Bombay, for the year ending 30th June 1897.

Currie, P.M., Mu’in al-din Chishti of Ajmer, Delhi, 1989.

Das, Karashni Narayan, Shri Sindh Sapt Nad Sadhubela Teerath Mahatamay [The Importance of the Seven Rivers of Shri Sindh, Sadhubela Teerath, Anthology of passages about the Indus from Hindu scriptures in Sindhi and Sanskrit], Sukkur, 1922.

Duarte, Adrian, A History of British Relations with Sind 1613-1843, Karachi, 1976.

Eastwick, E.B., Dry Leaves from Young Egypt, London, 1851.

Eaton, Richard, The rise of Islam and the Bengal frontier, 1204-1760, Berkeley/London, 1993.

Gurusakhi Suryodaya Charitamrit i.e. Guru Bankhandi Yogsidhi [History of the Miracles manifested by Sat-guru Bankhandi Sahib], tr. Banhomal Kishindas Chabria, Sukkur, 1936.

Hasan, Arif, ‘A Changing Cityscape’ in Star Special Report, July 7 1984;
‘Another Time, Another Place: A journey through Karachi’s pre-British past’ in The Herald, Karachi, August 1986;
‘The Development in Pakistan and the Economic and Social Changes Associated with it’ from Lecture Forum Series 1, Karachi, 1999;
The Unplanned Revolution: Observations on the Process of Socio-Economic Change in Pakistan, Karachi, 2002.

Hasan, Maulana & Maulana Shabir Ahmad Usmani, Tafsir Usmani, Lahore, 1335 AH [1916].

Hughes, A.W., A Gazetteer of the Province of Sindh, London, 1874.

Human Rights Watch, Crime or Custom? Violence against women in Pakistan, Karachi, 2001.

Husain, N. et al, ‘Depression and social stress in Pakistan’, in Psychological Medicine, March 2000 (XXX: 2, pp.395-402).

Husain, Yusuf, L’Inde Mystique Au Moyden Age: Hindous et Musulmans, Paris, 1929.

International Seminar on Kalhora Rule in Sindh, Karachi, 1996.

Jotwani, Motilal, Sufis of Sindh, Delhi, 1986.

Kazi, Elsa, Risalo of Shah Abdul Latif, Hyderabad, 1996 [1965].

Khakee, Gulshan, The Dasa Avatara of the Satpanthi Ismailis and the Imam Shahis of Indo-Pakistan, Unpublished PhD, Harvard, Cambridge (Mass), 1972.

Khamisani, Amena, The Risalo of Shah Abdul Latif Bhitai: Translated in Verse. Hyderabad, 2003.

Khuhro, Hamida, ‘Masjid Manzilgah 1939-40: Test case for Hindu-Muslim Relations in Sind’ in Modern Asian Studies, Cambridge, 1998b.

Kincaid, C.A., Folk Tales of Sind and Guzarat, Karachi, 1925.

Lari, Yasmeen & Suhail Zaheer, The Jewel of Sindh: Summa Monuments on Makli Hill, Karachi, 1997.

le Strange, Guy, Lands of the Eastern Caliphate, Cambridge, 1930.

Manrique, Fray Sebastien, Travels of Fray Sebastien Manrique 1629-1643: A Translation of the Itinerario de las Missiones Orientales, Volume II: China, India, Etc., Oxford, 1927.

Manzoor, Hamid, The Medical Spectrum: Journal of Pakistan Medical Association Karachi – Special Issue Violence Against Women, Karachi, December 2001 (XXII:12).

Mariwalla, C.L., ‘The Tri-islets in the Indus’, in Sindhian World, Karachi, 1940 (I:3).

Markovits, Claude, The Global World of Indian Merchants, 1750-1947. Traders of Sind from Bukhara to Panama, Cambridge, 2000.

Masud, M., Hari Report: note of dissent, Karachi, [1975].

Maududi, S. Abul A’la, Al-Hijab: Purdah and the Status of Women in Islam, tr. Al-Ash‘ari, Lahore, 1998 [1972].

Memon, Muhammad Siddique G., Sukkur Then and Now, Karachi, 2000.

Mirza, Ilyas & Rachel Jenkins, ‘Risk factors, prevalence and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: systematic review’, British Medical Journal, London, 3 April 2004 (328: 794).

Mirza, K.F., Life of Shah Abdul Latif Bhitai: And a Brief Commentary on his Risalo with Selections bearing on the Mystic Philosophy of Sufis, Hyderabad, 1980.

Panhwar, M.H., Source Material on Sind, Jamshoro, Pakistan, 1977.

Pithawalla, M.B., Sind’s Changing Map: An Album Containing 51 Old and Rare Maps of Sind with Critical and Explanatory Notes on them, Karachi, 1938.

Qasim, Qasim Ali, ‘Pucca Qila Hyderabad’ [pamphlet], Hyderabad, 2002.

Qureshi, Regula Burckhardt, Sufi Music of India and Pakistan: Sound, Context and Meaning in Qawwali, Karachi, 2006 [1986].

Qureshi, Mian Iqbal Ahmed [Sajjadah Nasheen], History in Brief of Dargah Hazrat Khawaja Khizer Rohri Sharif Dist. Sukkur (Sindh) [Manuscript pamphlet, in press], Sukkur, c.2006.

Rashdi, Sayed Hussamuddin, ‘Sufi Shah Inayat Shaheed’ and ‘Shah Inayat Sufi, the first agricultural reformist of Sindh’ [both articles taken from his Sindhi work ‘Chats about the folk villages’], Hyderabad, 1981.

Sadarangani, H.I., Persian Poets of Sind, Karachi, 1956.

Sahrai, Taj Muhammad, Lake Manchar: the most ancient sea of Sindhu Cultures, Karachi, 1997.

Schimmel, Annemarie, ‘Shah Inayat of Jhok, A Sindhi Mystic’, in Liber Amicorum: Studies in Honor of Professor Dr CJ Bleeker, Leiden, 1969; Sindhi Literature, Wiesbaden, 1974;
Mystical Dimensions of Islam, Chapel Hill [North Carolina Press], 1975;
Pain and Grace: A Study of Two Mystical Writers of Eighteenth Century Muslim India, Leiden, 1976;
Pearls from the Indus, Jamshoro, Pakistan, 1986;
My Soul Is a Woman: The Feminine in Islam, tr. Susan H. Ray, New York, 1997 [1995].

Seth, Mesrovb Jacob, Armenians in India: From the Earliest Times to the Present Day, Calcutta, 1937 (quoted in ‘Sarmad, A mystic poet beheaded in 1661’ on

Sharot, Stephen, A Comparative Sociology of World Religions: Virtuosos, Priests, and Popular Religion, New York/London, 2001.

Sibt-e-Hassan, ‘Socialist Sufi of Sindh’ [article taken from book Naveed-e-Fiqr], Karachi, 1995;
‘Sufi Shah Inayat Jee Halchal’ [The Movement of Sufi Shah Inayat’] in Jadhen Jhok Jhurio [When Jhok was ruined], np, nd.

Sind Hari Committee [Hyder Baksch Jatoi, President], Break up ONE UNIT: Restore Full Provincial Autonomy to Sind, Baluchistan, Pashtoonistan, Hyderabad, 1969;
Haris’ Petition of Rights: Amendments to the Sind Tenancy Act, 1950, Hyderabad, 1952;
[H.B.Jatoi] Disposal of Gudu Barrage State Lands (And Makhi Dhandhu Area), Hyderabad, 1967.

Singer, Isidore and Louis H. Gray, ‘Sarmad, Mohammed Sa‘id’ in Jewish Encyclopedia,, 2002.

Smyth, J.W., Gazetteer of the Province of Sind: “B” Volume I Karachi District, Bombay, 1919; Volume III Sukkur District, Bombay, 1919;“B” Volume II Hyderabad District, Bombay, 1920.

Sorley, H.T., Shah Abdul Latif of Bhit: His Poetry, Life and Times. A Study of Literary, Social and Economic Conditions in Eighteenth Century Sind, Oxford, 1940.

Stuart, Tristram, The Bloodless Revolution: Radical Vegetarians and the Discovery of India, London, 2006.

Syed, G.M., Religion and Reality, Karachi, 1986;
The Case of Sindh: G.M. Syed’s Deposition for the Court, Karachi, 1995.

Raverty, H.G., The Mihrán of Sind and its Tributaries: a geographical and historical study, Calcutta, 1892.

Temple, Sir Richard Carnac, ‘Zinda Peer, the everliving saint of India’ [Manuscript and typescript in the archives of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 96088], c.1930;
‘A general view of Indian Muslim saints’ [First monograph of author’s researches into the nature of Zinda Peer, everliving saint of India: Manuscript and typescript in the archives of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 96086], 1931.

Thakur, Naraindas S., Jai Jhoole Lal Life Story: Amar Uderolal, Pushkar, n.d.

Wink, André, Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Vol I, Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam 7th-11th centuries, Oxford, 1999 [1990].

Yusuf, Zohra, ed., Rhythms of the Lower Indus: Perspectives on the Music of Sindh, Karachi, 1988.

Zaidi, Mazhar, Hassan Mujtaba & Farhad Nabi, ‘The last of the Mohanos: Special Report’ in The News International, Karachi, October 21 1994.

Abbasi, A.N.G., Report of Technical Committee on Water Resources [‘Abbasi Report’], Islamabad:, 2005.

Ahmad, Aziz, Studies in Islamic Culture in the Indian Environment, Oxford, 1964.

Ahuja, N.D., The Great Guru Nanak and the Muslims, Chandigarh, [1972?].

Ali, Imran, The Punjab Under Imperialism, 1885-1947, Princeton, 1988.

Bengali, Kaiser, ed., The Politics of Managing Water, Oxford/Islamabad, 2003.

Burnes, Alexander, ‘Letter from Captain Burnes to Gen. Ramsay relating to proceedings at Roopur’ [Dalhousie Letters, National Archives of Scotland: G45/5/93], , 31 October 1831.

Cohen, Stephen P., The Indian Army: Its Contribution to the Development of a Nation, Delhi, 1990 [1971];
The Pakistan Army. 1998 Edition. With a New Foreword and Epilogue, Oxford, 1999 [1994];
The Idea of Pakistan. Washington D.C., 2004.

Gadgil, Madhav & Ramachandra Guha, The Use and Abuse of Nature, New Delhi, 2000.

Gazdar, Muhammad Nasir, An Assessment of the Kalabagh Dam Project on the River Indus Pakistan – The Sabz Bagh: ‘Promising a Rose Garden but Delivering Dust’, Karachi, 1990.

Gazdar, Mushtaq, Pakistan Cinema 1947-1997, Karachi, 1997.

Gulraj, Jethmal Parsram, Sind and its Sufis, Madras, 1924.

Husain, Yusuf, L’Inde Mystique Au Moyen Age: Hindous et Musulmans, Paris, 1929.

Kohli, Surindar Singh, Travels of Guru Nanak, Chandigarh, 1969.

Kumar, Amitava, ‘Splitting the Difference’, in Transition, Issue 89, 2001.

Lafont, Jean-Marie, Indika: Essays in Indo-French Relations, 1630-1976, Delhi, 2000.

Mann, Gurinder Singh, The Making of Sikh Scripture, Oxford, 2001.

Markovits, Claude, The Global World of Indian Merchants, 1750-1947. Traders of Sind from Bukhara to Panama, Cambridge, 2000.

McLeod, W.H., Guru Nanak and the Sikh Religion, Delhi, 1996 [1968].

Mosley, Leonard, The Last Days of the British Raj, London, 1962.

Nayyar, A.H. & Ahmed Salim, in The Subtle Subversion: The State of Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan, Islamabad, n.d. c.2003.

Padmanabhan, Manjula, Getting There, London, 2000.

Pakistan, Islamic Republic of, Presentation of Sind Case Before the Indus Waters Committee: Presented by A.W.F. Shaikh [Photocopy of unpublished document, marked ‘For Official Use Only’], 1971.

Pearce, Fred, When the Rivers Run Dry: What happens when our water runs out?, London, 2006.

Purewal, Shinder, Sikh Ethnonationalism and the Political Economy of the Punjab, New Delhi, 2000.

Richards, J.F. et al, ‘Changing Land Use in Bihar, Punjab and Haryana, 1850-1970’, in Modern Asian Studies, Cambridge, 1985.

Saeed, Fouzia, Taboo: The Hidden Culture of a Red Light Area, Karachi, 2002.

Saigol, Rubina, ‘Curriculum in India and Pakistan’ in South Asian Journal, October-December 2004:

Schimmel, Annemarie, Pain and Grace: A Study of Two Mystical Writers of Eighteenth Century Muslim India, Leiden, 1976.

Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, The Golden Temple: Its Theo-Political Status [by Sirdar Kapur Singh], Amritsar, 2002;
Sikh Reht Maryada: The Code of Sikh Conduct and Conventions, Amritsar, 2004.

Shiva, Vandana, The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politics, London, 1991.

Siddiqa, Ayesha, Military Inc: inside Pakistan’s military economy, London, 2007.

Singh, Fauja & Kirpal Singh, Atlas: Travels of Guru Nanak, Patiala, 1976.

Singh, Harnam, Punjab The Homeland of the Sikhs, Lahore, 1945.

Singh, Khushwant, A History of the Sikhs Volume 1: 1469-1839, Delhi, 2005 [1963];
tr. Hymns of Guru Nanak, Bombay, 1978 [1969].

Singh, Maharaja Ranjit, Letter to Alexander Burnes, John Murray archive (now in the National Library of Scotland), n.d..

Waslekar, Sundeep [Strategic Foresight Group], The Final Settlement: Restructuring India-Pakistan Relations, Mumbai, 2005.

Chapter Six

Abul-Fazl, The Akbarnama of Abu-l-Fazl, tr. H. Beveridge, Calcutta, 1910 (III);
Ain-i-Akbari by Abu l-Fazl Allami, H. Blochmann & H.S. Jarrett, trs, Calcutta, 1927-49.
Alberuni, Alberuni’s India: An Account of the Religion, Philosophy, Literature, Geography, Chronology, Astronomy, Customs, Laws and Astrology of India about A.D.1030, tr. Edward C. Sachau, London, 1888.

Ali, Tariq, The Clash of Fundamentalisms: Crusades, Jihads and Modernity, London, 2002.

Al Utbi, The Kitab-i-Yamini, Historical Memoirs of the Amir Sabaktagin and the Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna, tr. James Reynolds, London, 1858.

Ammon, Richard, Global

Arberry, A.J., Classical Persian Literature, London, 1967 [1958].

Baloch, N.A., Lands of Pakistan: Perspectives, historical and cultural, Islamabad, 1416 AH [1995].

Barthold, W., tr, Turkestan Down to the Mongol Invasion, London, 1928.

Babur, The Babur-nama in English (Memoirs of Babur), [Translated from the original Turki text of Zahiru’d-din Muhammad Babur Padshah Ghazi], tr. Annette Beveridge, London, 1922.

Banerjee, Mukulika, The Pathan Unarmed: Opposition and Memory in the North West Frontier, Oxford, 2000.

Biddulph, C.E., Afghan Poetry of the Seventeenth Century: Being Selections from the Poems of Khush Hal Khan Khatak, London, 1890.

Bilgrami, Raft Masood, Religious and Quasi-Religious Departments of the Mughal Period (1556-1707), Delhi, 1984.

Bosworth, Clifford Edmund, The Ghaznavids: Their Empire in Afghanistan and Eastern Iran 994-1040, Edinburgh, 1963.

Bouhdiba, Abdelwahab, Sexuality in Islam, tr. Alan Sheridan, London, 1985 [1975].

Browne, Edward G., A Literary History of Persian From the Earliest Times until Firdawsi, London, 1909.

Burton, Richard, ‘Terminal Essay: Social Conditions: Pederasty’ in A Plain and Literal Translation of the Arabian Nights Entertainments, Boston, 1919 (X).

Caroe, Olaf, The Pathans, London, 1958.

Coll, Steve, Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 19, 2001, New York, 2004.

Constitutional, Political, Economic and Cultural Exploitation of Pashtoonkhwa: The Seminar organized by PONM (Pakistan Oppressed Nations Movement) [Papers presented by Pashtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party], Islamabad, 2004.

Dani, Professor Ahmad Hasan, Alberuni’s Indica (A Record of the Cultural History of South Asia about AD 1030), Islamabad, 1973.

Dozy, R., Supplement aux Dictionnaires Arabes, Leyde, 1881.

Dupree, Nancy Hatch, An historical guide to Afghanistan, Kabul, 1977 [1970].

Elliot, H.M., The History of India, as told by its own historians: the Muhammadan period, ed. John Dowson, London, 1867-77 (II).

Elphinstone, Mountstuart, The History of India, London, 1843 [1841].

Enevoldsen, Jens, tr., Sound the bells, O moon, arise and shine! A Collection of Pashto proverbs and tappas, Peshawar, 2004 [1969].

Ferdowsi, Le Livre des Rois par Abou’l Kasim Firdousi, traduit du persan par Jules Mohl, Paris, 1876.

Ferishta, Muhammad Kasim, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India, tr. J. Briggs, London, 1829 (I).

Habib, Mohammad, Sultan Mahmud of Ghaznin, Aligarh, 1951 [1927].

Howell, Evelyn & Olaf Caroe, The Poems of Khushal Khan Khatak, Peshawar, 1963.

Iran Society, Al Biruni Commemoration Volume, Calcutta, 1951.

Ismail, Prof M., ‘Ghazi Brotha’s effects on Swabi’ in The News International, Karachi, November 18 1995;
‘Community Perceptions of Male Child Sexual Abuse in North West Frontier Province, Pakistan’, Peshawar:, [nd, c.1997].

Joshi, Rita, The Afghan Nobility and the Mughals, 1526-1707, Delhi, 1985.

Kazmi, S. Hasan Askari, The Makers of Muslim Geography: Alberuni, Delhi, 1995.

Kennedy, Miranda, ‘Open Secrets’, Boston Globe, Boston, 11 July 2004.

Khan, Ghani, The Pathans: A Sketch, Peshawar, 1958.

Mackenzie, D.N., Poems from the Divan of Khushal Khan Khattak, London, 1965.

Majumdar, R.C., The History and Culture of the Indian People, The Struggle for Empire, Bombay, 1957.

Mmh, Turaj, Lundaye: Pashto Folk Couplets, Kabul, 2002.

Muhammad, Tufail & Naeem Zafar, ‘Situational Analysis Report on Prostitution of Boys in Pakistan (Lahore & Peshawar)’,, June 2006.

Murray, Stephen O. & Will Roscoe, eds, Islamic Homosexualities: Culture, History and Literature, New York, 1997a;
& Badruddin Khan, ‘Pakistan’ in Sociolegal control of homosexuality: a multi-nation comparison, Donald J. West & Richard Green, eds, New York, 1997b, pp.119-126.

Narrain, Arvind & Brototi Dutta, ‘Male-to-male sex, and sexuality minorities in South Asia: An analysis of the politico-legal framework’, in Risks and Responsibilities: Male Sexual Health and HIV in Asia and the Pacific-International Consultation, New Delhi,, 23-26 September 2006.

Nath, R., History of Mughal Architecture, New Delhi, 1982.

Nazim, Muhammad, The Life and Times of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna, Cambridge 1931.

NWFP, Government of, ‘Hisbah Bill’, Law, Parliamentary Affairs and Human Rights Department Government of NWFP, Peshawar, 2005.

National Democratic Consultative Process, Pakhtunkhwa: A Developmental Framework, [Peshawar?], May 2003.

Qaiyum, Abdul, Gold and Guns on the Pathan Frontier, Bombay, 1945.

Qisas & Diyat Ordinance, Lahore, n.d.

Rahim, Muhammad Abdur, History of the Afghans in India AD 1545-1631, Karachi, 1954.

Rashid, Ahmed: Taliban: The Story of the Afghan Warlords [first edition subtitled Islam, Oil and the New Great Game in Central Asia], London, 2001 [2000].

Raverty, H.G., Selections from the Poetry of the Afghans, Lahore, 2002 [1862];
A Grammar of the Afghan Language, London, 1867;
Tabakat i Nasiri: A General History of the Muhammadan Dynasties of Asia, Delhi, 1970 [1881];
Notes on Afghanistan and part of Baluchistan, London, 1888.

Richards, J.F., The Mughal Empire, Cambridge, 1993.

Roy Choudhury, M.L., The State and Religion in Mughal India, Calcutta, 1951.

Schmitt, Arno and Jehoeda Sofer, eds, Sexuality and Eroticism Among Males in Moslem Societies, Binghampton/London, 1992.

Sharma, Arvind, Studies in Alberuni’s India, Wiesbaden, 1983.

Sharma, S.R., The Religious Policy of the Mughal Emperors, London, 1972 [1940].

Sharma, Sunil, Persian Poetry at the Indian Frontier, Delhi, 2000.

Sodomy Laws:

South Asian Citizens’ Wire:

Stewart, Rory, The Places in Between, London, 2004.

Thapar, Romila, Narratives and The Making of History: Two Lectures, Delhi, 2000.

The Frontier Post, Peshawar & Quetta.

Vigne, G.T., A Personal Narrative of a visit to Ghuzni, Kabul, and Afghanistan, and of a residence at the court of Dost Mohamed, London, 1840.

Welch, Stuart Cary, A King’s Book of King: The Shah-Nameh of Shah Tahmasp, New York, 1972.

Wink, André, Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Vol I, Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam 7th-11th centuries, Oxford, 1999 [1990].

Zafar, Emmanuel, Law & Practice of Islamic Hudood, Lahore, 2002 [1981].

Chapter Seven

Ackermann, Hans Christopher, Narrative Stone Reliefs from Gandhara in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London: Catalogue and Attempt at a Stylistic History, Rome, 1975.

Alberuni, Alberuni’s India: An Account of the Religion, Philosophy, Literature, Geography, Chronology, Astronomy, Customs, Laws and Astrology of India about A.D.1030, tr. Edward C. Sachau, London, 1888.

Al-Idrisi, India and the Neighbouring Territories in the Kitab Nuzhat Al-Mushtaq Fi’Khtiraq Al-Afaq of Al-Sharif Al-Idrisi, tr. S. Maqbul Ahmad, Leiden, 1960.

Baker, P.H.B. & and F.R. Allchin, Shahr-i Zohak and the History of the Bamiyan Valley Afghanistan, Oxford, 1991.

Barger, Evert & Philip Wright, Excavations in Swat and Explorations in the Oxus Territories of Afghanistan. A detailed report of the 1938 Expedition, Delhi, 1941.

Beyer, Stephan, The Cult of Tara: Magic and Ritual in Tibet, Berkeley, 1978.

Bloch, Jules, tr., Les Inscriptions d’Asoka, Paris, 1950.

Boucher, Daniel, ‘Gandhari and the early Chinese Buddhist translations reconsidered: the case of the Saddharmapundarikasutra’ in The Journal of the American Oriental Society, New Haven, October 1998 (CXVIII:4, pp. 471-473).

Buchthal, H., The Western Aspects of Gandhara Sculpture, Oxford, 1945.

Cammann, Schuyler, Trade Through the Himalayas: The Early British Attempts to Open Tibet, Princeton, 1951.

Carter, Martha L., ‘Dionysiac Aspects of Kushan Art’, in Ars Orientalis: The Arts of Islam and the East, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1968 (VII);
‘Dionysiac Festivals and Gandharan Imagery’, in Res Orientales IV: Banquets d’Orient, Leuven, 1992.

Chandra, Moti, Trade and trade routes in ancient India, New Delhi, 1977.

Coomaraswamy, Ananda K., The Origin of the Buddha Image, New York, 1927.

Dargyay, Eva M., The Rise of Esoteric Buddhism in Tibet, Delhi, 1979 [1977].

Dhammika, Ven. S., The Edicts of King Ashoka:

Dupree, Nancy Hatch, Gandhara: An Instant Guide to Pakistan’s Heritage, Karachi, 1980.

Elisseeff, Vadime, ed., The Silk Roads: Highways of Culture and Commerce, New York/Oxford, 2000.

Ellam, J.E., Buddhism and Lamaism: A Study of the Religion of Tibet, Calcutta/Simla, 1924.

Faccenna, Domenico, Sculptures from the Sacred Area of Butkara I, Part 2: Plates, Rome, 1962;
A Guide to the Excavations in Swat (Pakistan) 1956-1962, Rome, 1964;
G. Tucci & Domenico Faccenna, eds, Butkara I (Swat, Pakistan) 1956-1962; Part 1: Text, [Reports and Memoirs, Volume III: 1], Rome, 1980.

Fa Hsien, A Record of Buddhistic Kingdoms: Being an Account by the Chinese Monk Fâ-Hien of His Travels in India and Ceylon (A.D. 399-414) In Search of the Buddhist Books of Discipline, tr. James Legge, Oxford, 1886.

Foltz, Richard C., Religions of the Silk Road: Overland Trade and Cultural Exchange from Antiquity to the Fifteenth Century, London, 1999.

Foucher, Alfred, L’Art Gréco-Bouddhique du Gandhâra, Paris, 1905-1941;
La Vieille Route de l’Inde de Bactres à Taxila, Paris, 1942.
Goswami, Jaya, Cultural History of Ancient India (A Socio-Economic and Religio-Cultural Survey of Kapisa and Gandhara), Delhi, 1979.

Habib, Mohammad, Sultan Mahmud of Ghaznin, Aligarh, 1951 [1927].

Hackin, J., Memoires de la Delegation Archeologique Francaise en Afghanistan, Tome III, Nouvelles Recherche Archeologiques a Bamiyan, Paris, 1933;
with Ahmad Ali Khozad, Legendes et Coutumes Afghanes, Paris, 1953.

Hallade, Madeleine, The Gandhara Style: and the Evolution of Buddhist Art, London, 1968.

Horner, I.B., tr., Milinda’s Questions, London, 1964.

Hultzsch, E., Inscriptions of Asoka, Oxford, 1925.

Ingholt, Harold, Gandharan Art in Pakistan, New York, 1957.

Italian Archaeological Mission (IsmEO) Pakistan, Swat, 1956-1981: documentary exhibition, Rome, 1982.

Jettmar, Karl, ‘Ethnological Research in Dardistan 1958’, in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, February 1961 (CV:1, pp.79-97).
Bolar and Dardistan: A Contribution to the Political and Ethnic Geography of Northern Pakistan; Ethnological Research in Dardistan, Islamabad, 1980 [1958].

Kalter, Johannes: The Arts and Crafts of the Swat Valley: Living Traditions in the Hindu Kush, London, 1991.

Kangle, R.P., tr., The Kautiliya Arthasastra, Bombay, 1965-72.

Karttunen, K., India in Early Greek Literature, Helsinki, 1989.

Kawamura, Leslie S, ed., The Bodhisattva Doctrine in Buddhism, Waterloo, Ontario, 1981.

Kepel, Gilles, Jihad: the trail of political Islam, Cambridge, Mass., 2002 [2000].

Khan, Makin, ‘The Tibetan Pilgrim, Urgyan-Pa, also passed through Swat valley in 1250AD’ in Archaeological Museum Saidu Sharif, Swat: A Guide, Saidu Sharif, 1997.

Klimburg Salter, Deborah, The Kingdom of Bamiyan: Buddhist Art and Culture of the Hindu Kush, Naples-Rome, 1989.

Lamotte, Etienne, History of Indian Buddhism, Louvain La Neuve, 1988.

Linrothe, Rob, ed., Holy Madness: portraits of tantric siddhas, Chicago, 2006.

Lopez, Donald S., Buddhism, London, 2001.

Mainwaring, Lieut Colonel, The Gandhara Sculptures, A Symposium, Dorchester, 1903.

Marshall, John, A guide to Taxila, Calcutta, 1921.

Milindapanha, [The Questions of King Milinda], ed. T.W.R. Rhys Davids, [Sacred Books of the East volume 35], Oxford, 1890-1894;

Mishra, T.N., Buddhist Tantra and Buddhist Art, New Delhi, 2000.

Musée Guimet, L’Art du Gandhara et de l’Asie Centrale dans les collections du Pakistan, de Berlin et de Rome, Paris, 1958-1959.

Narain, A.K., ed., Studies in Buddhist Art of South Asia, New Delhi, 1985.

Rowland, Benjamin, The Evolution of the Buddha Image, New York, 1963.

Salomon, Richard, Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages, Oxford, 1998;
Ancient Buddhist Scrolls from Gandhara: The British Library Kharoshti Fragments, London, 1999.

Samuel, Geoffrey, Civilized Shamans: Buddhism in Tibetan Societies, Washington/London, 1993.

Sardar, Badshah, Buddhist Rock Carvings in the Swat Valley, Islamabad, 2005.

Sehrai, Fidaullah, Hund The Forgotten City of Gandhara, Peshawar, 1979.

Stacul, Giorgio, Prehistoric and Protohistoric Swat, Pakistan (c.3000 BC – 1400 BC), Rome, 1987.

Tarn, W.W., The Greeks in Bactria and India, Cambridge, 1951.

Thapar, Romila, Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas, Delhi, 1997 [1961];
The Mauryas Revisited, New Delhi, 1987.

Tissot, Francine, The Art of Gandhara: Buddhist monks on the North-West Frontier of Pakistan, Paris, 1986.

Trail, Gail H., ‘Tysam revisited: a study of Kalasha origins’ in Elena Bashir & Israr-ud-Din, eds., Proceedings of the second International Hindukush Cultural Conference, Karachi, 1996, pp.359-76.

Tucci, G., The Religions of Tibet, London, 1980.

van Lohuizen de Leeuw, J.E., ‘New Evidence with Regard to the Origin of the Buddha Image’, in South Asian Archaeology, ed. Herbert Hartel, Berlin, 1979.

Waddell, L. Austine, The Buddhism of Tibet or Lamaism, Cambridge, 1934 [1895].

Sims-Williams, Nicholas, ‘New Findings in Ancient Afghanistan: the Bactrian documents discovered from the Northern Hindu-Kush’ [Lecture at Ancient Orient Museum, Tokyo], 23/09/1997:

Williams, Paul, Mahayana Buddhism, London, 1989.

Wink, André, Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Vol I, Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam 7th-11th centuries, Oxford, 1999 [1990].

Wriggins, Sally Hovey, XuanZang: A Buddhist Pilgrim on the Silk Road, Oxford/Colorado, 1996.

XuanZang, Si Yu Ki: Buddhist Records of the Western World, tr. Samuel Beal, London, 2000 [1884];
The Life of Hieun-Tsiang, by the Shamans Hwui Li and Yen-Tsung, tr. Samuel Beal, London, 1888.

Zwalf, W., A Catalogue of the Gandhara Sculpture in the British Museum, Volume 1: Text, London, 1996.

Chapter Eight

Aeschylus, Aeschylus II: The Suppliant Maidens, The Persians, Seven Against Thebes, Prometheus Bound, Chicago, 1956.

Allen, Charles, The Search for Shangri-La, London, 1999.

Arrian, Anabasis Alexandri, tr. E. Iliff Robson, London, 1929;
Arrian. 1, Anabasis Alexandri, tr. P.A. Brunt, Cambridge, Mass., 1976;
The Campaigns of Alexander, tr. Aubrey de Sélincourt, London, 1971.
Ashley, James R., The Macedonian Empire: The Era of Warfare Under Philip II and Alexander the Great, 359 – 323 BC, Jefferson/London, 1998.

Balfour, Edward, Medical Hints to the People of India: The Vydian and the Hakim, What do they know of medicine?, Madras, 1875.

Babur, The Babur-nama in English (Memoirs of Babur), tr. Annette Beveridge, London, 1921 (I).

Bharucha, F.R., A Textbook of the Plant Geography of India, Bombay, 1983.

Bor, N.L., Manual of Indian Forest Botany, Oxford, 1953.

Bosworth, A.B., ‘Alexander and the Iranians’, in Journal of Hellenic Studies, London, 1980 (C, pp.1-21);
A Historical commentary on Arrian’s history of Alexander, Oxford, 1995.

Briant, Pierre, From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, tr. Peter T. Daniels, Winona Lake, 2002.

Bunbury, E.H., A History of Ancient Geography Among the Greeks and Romans, New York, 1959 [1883].

Caroe, Olaf, The Pathans: 550 B.C. – A.D.1957, London, 1962.

Carter, Martha L., ‘Dionysiac Aspects of Kushan Art’, in Ars Orientalis: The Arts of Islam and the East, Ann Arbor, 1968 (VII).

Cunningham, Alexander, Ladák, Physical, Statistical, and Historical; With Notices of the Surrounding Countries, London, 1854.

Curtius Rufus, Quintus, The Actes of the Greate Alexander, tr. Iohn Brende, Amsterdam/New York, 1971 [London, 1553];
The History of Alexander, tr. John Yardley, Harmondsworth, 1984.

Davis, Dick, Epic and Sedition: the case of Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh, Fayetteville (U.S.A.), 1992.

Diodorus, Siculus, The Antiquities of Asia: A Translation with Notes of Book II of the Library of History of Diodorus Siculus, tr., Edwin Murphy, New Brunswick/Oxford, 1989.

Eggermont, P.H.L., ‘Alexander’s Campaign in Gandhara and Ptolemy’s List of Indo-Scythian Towns’, in Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica, Leuven, 1970, pp.63-123.

Ehrenberg, Victor, Alexander and the Greeks, tr. Ruth Fraenkel von Velsen, Oxford, 1938.

Euripides, Euripides V: The Bacchae, tr. William Arrowsmith, Chicago, 1959.

Foltz, Richard C., Religions of the Silk Road: Overland Trade and Cultural Exchange from Antiquity to the Fifteenth Century, London, 1999.

Gunderson, Lloyd L., Alexander’s Letter to Aristotle about India, Meisenheim am Glan, 1980.

Haider, Gul, [Unpublished notes on Alexander the Great’s campaigns in Bajaur given to me in Bajaur], 6.6.2005.

Hammond, N.G.L., Sources for Alexander the Great: An analysis of Plutarch’s Life and Arrian’s Anabasis Alexandrou, Cambridge, 1993.

Herodotus, The Histories, tr. George Rawlinson, London, 1992 [1910].

Homer, The Odyssey, tr. A.T. Murray, London, 1919;
The Iliad, tr. E.V. Rieu [revised and updated by Peter Jones with D.C.H. Rieu], Harmondsworth, 2003.

Hooker, J.D., The Flora of British India, London, 1879.

Horace, Odes and epodes, tr. Niall Rudd, Cambridge, Mass., 2004.

Hornblower, Simon & Antony Spawforth, The Oxford Classical Dictionary: Third Edition, Oxford, 1999 [1996].

Jamia Hamdard (Deemed to be University), History of Unani Medicine, New Delhi, 1993.

Jettmar, Karl, ‘An Ethnographic Sketch’ in Ahmad Hasan Dani, ed., History of Northern Areas of Pakistan (Upto 2000 AD), Lahore, 2001.

Karttunen, K., India in Early Greek Literature, Helsinki, 1989;
India and the Hellenistic World, Helsinki, 1997.

King, L.W. & R.C. Thompson, The Sculptures and Inscriptions of Darius the Great on the Rock of Behistun in Persia, London, 1907.

Knight, E.F., Where Three Empires Meet, London, 1893.

Lach, Donald F., Asia in the Making of Europe [I: The Century of Discovery, Bk 1], Chicago and London, 1965.

Lambert, Royston, Beloved and God: The Story of Hadria and Antinous, London, 1984.

Lane Fox, Robin, Alexander the Great, London, 1973;
The Search for Alexander, London, 1980.

Liddell, Henry George & Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford, 1843.

McCrindle, J.W., Ancient India as Described by Megasthenes and Arrian, London, 1877.

Parker, R.N., A Forest Flora for the Punjab with Hazara and Delhi, Lahore, 1924.

Philostratus the Elder, The Life of Apollonius of Tyana: the Epistles of Apollonius and the Treatise of Eusebius, tr. F.C. Conybeare, London, 1912.

Plutarch, The Age of Alexander: Nine Greek Lives by Plutarch, tr. Ian Scott-Kilvert, Harmondsworth, 1973.

Romm, James, ed., Alexander the Great: Selections from Arrian, Diodorus, Plutarch and Quintus Curtius, tr. Pamela Mensch & James Romm, Indianapolis/Cambridge, 2005.

Schildgen, Brenda Deen, ‘Dante and the Indus: The Salvation of Pagans’ in Dante and the Orient, Urbana, c.2002.

Southgate, Minoo S., tr., Iskandarnamah: A Persian Medieval Alexander-Romance, New York, 1978.

Stein, Aurel, On Alexander’s Track to the Indus, London, 1929.

Stoneman, Richard, tr., The Greek Alexander Romance, Harmondsworth, 1991.

Strabo, The Geography of Strabo, tr. Horace Leonard Jones, London, 1923 (II).

Tarn, W.W., Alexander the Great. Volume 1: Narrative, Cambridge, 1948.

Thapar, Romila, ‘Megasthenes: Text and Context’ in The Mauryas Revisited, Calcutta, 1987.

Wolohojian, Albert Mugrdich, tr., The Romance of Alexander the Great by Pseudo-Callisthenes, , New York, 1969.

Ali, Ihsan et al, ‘New Exploration in the Chitral Valley, Pakistan: an extension of the Gandharan Grave culture’, in Antiquity, Cambridge, September 2002 (LXXVI: 293);
ed., Frontier Archaeology: Explorations and Excavations in NWFP, Pakistan, Peshawar, 2005 (III).

Allchin, B, ‘South Asian rock art’, in Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, London, 1988, pp.138-156.

Allchin, F.R., ‘A Pottery Group from Ayun Chitral’, in Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, London, 1970 (XXXIII).

Anati, Emmanuel, ‘Saving the World’s Rock Art’, in Archaeology, New York, 1983 (XXXVI:2, pp.24-30).

Barth, Fredrik, Indus and Swat Kohistan: An Ethnographic Survey, Oslo, 1956.

Bashir, Elena & Israr-ud-Din, eds, Proceedings of the Second International Hindukush Cultural Conference, Karachi, 1996.

Biddulph, John, Tribes of the Hindoo Koosh, Calcutta, 1880.

Bleeck, Arthur Henry, The Religious Books of the Parsees; from Professor Spiegel’s German Translation of the Original Manuscripts, London, 1864.

Briant, Pierre, From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, tr. Peter T. Daniels, Winona Lake, 2002.

Bryant, Edwin, The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate, New Delhi, 2002 [2001];
with Laurie Patton, eds, The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and inference in Indian history, London, 2005.

Burrow, T., The Sanskrit Language, London, 1973 [1955].

Cacopardo, Albert & Augusto, ‘The Kalasha in Southern Chitral’ in Elena Bashir & Israr-ud-Din, eds, Proceedings of the Second International Hindukush Cultural Conference, Karachi, 1996.

Chakravarty, Kalyan Kumar & Robert G. Bednarik, Indian Rock Art and Its Global Context, Delhi, 1997.

Coomaraswamy, Ananda, A New Approach to the Vedas: An Essay in Translation and Exegesis, London, 1933.

Curtis, Gregory, The cave painters: probing the mysteries of the first artists, New York 2006.

Dani, A.H., Ancient Pakistan, Peshawar, 1967 (III);
ed., Journal of Central Asia, 1978 (I:1);
Chilas: The City of Nanga Parvat (Dyamar), Islamabad, 1983;
Recent Archaeological Discoveries in Pakistan, Paris/Tokyo, 1988;
History of Northern Areas of Pakistan (Upto 2000 AD), Lahore, 2001.

Das, Karashni Narayan, Shri Sindh Sapt Nad Sadhubela Teerath Mahatamay [The Importance of the Seven Rivers of Shri Sindh, Sadhubela Teerath, Anthology of passages about the Indus from Hindu scriptures in Sindhi and Sanskrit], Sukkur, 1922.

Deshmukh, P.R., The Indus Civilisation in the Rgveda, Nagpur, c.1954.

Doniger O’Flaherty, Wendy, The Rigveda An Anthology: One hundred and eight hymns, Selected, Translated and Annotated, Harmondsworth, 1981.

Erdosy, G., ‘Ethnicity in the Rigveda and its Bearing on the Question of Indo-European Origins, in South Asian Studies, 5, 1989, London, pp.35-47;
ed., The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity, Berlin/New York, 1995.

Falk, Harry, ‘Soma I and II’ in Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, London, 1989 (LV, pp.77-90);
‘The Purpose of Rgvedic Ritual’ in Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora 2, Cambridge, Mass., 1997.

Grierson, G.A., Note on the Languages of India, [Census of India: Not printed for publication], Camberley? 1902?

Griffith, Ralph, The Hymns of the Rigveda: Translated with a popular commentary, Benares, 1889.

Hallier, Ulrich W., ‘Petroglyphen in Nordpakistan: Neuentdeckungen an Gilgit und Yasin, in Antike Welt, Mainz, 1991 (XXII, pp.2-20).

Hauptmann, Harold, ed., The Indus: Cradle and Crossroads of Civilizations: Pakistan-German Archaeological Research, Islamabad, 1997.

Jettmar, Karl, ed., Cultures of the Hindukush: Selected Papers from the Hindu-Kush Cultural Conference Held at Moesgard 1970, Wiesbaden, 1974;
Bolor and Dardistan, Lahore, 1980a;
Bergvölker im Hindukusch und Karakorum, Graz, 1980b (III);
Rock Carvings and Inscriptions in the Northern Areas of Pakistan, 1982, Islamabad;
The Religions of the Hindukush. Vol 1: The Religion of the Kafirs: The Pre-Islamic Heritage of Afghan Nuristan, Warminister, 1986;
ed., Antiquities of Northern Pakistan: Reports and Studies, Vol 1: Rock Inscriptions in the Indus Valley, Mainz, 1989;
‘The Art of the Northern Nomads in the Upper Indus Valley’, in South Asian Studies, London, 1991 (VII, pp.1-20);
Beyond the Gorges of the Indus: Archaeology before Excavation, Karachi, 2002.

Jha, Vivekanand, ‘Stages in the History of Untouchables’, in The Indian Historical Review, Biannual Journal of the Indian Council of Historical Research, Delhi, July 1975 (II: 1, pp. 14-31).

Jones, William, Discourses delivered before the Asiatic Society, London, 1821.

Karttunen, K., India in Early Greek Literature, Helsinki, 1989.

Khan, Gulzar Mmd, ‘Excavations at Zarif Karuna’, in Pakistan Archaeology, Karachi, 1973 (IX).

Kipling, Rudyard, The Man Who Would be King: Single Tales and Poems, New York, 1899.

King, Cuthbert, ‘Rock Carvings on the Indus’ in Man: A Monthly Record of Anthropological Science, London, May 1940 (LXXXIII).

Lines, Maureen, Beyond the North-West Frontier, Sparkford, Yeovil, 1988;
The Kalasha People of North-Western Pakistan, Peshawar, 1996?

Loude, Jean-Yves & Viviane Lièvre, Solstice païen: Fetes d’hiver chez les Kalash du Nord-Pakistan, Paris, 1984.

Mahabharata, Mahabharata: Translated into English prose from the original Sanskrit text, tr. Kisari Mohan Ganguli, New Delhi, 1993 [1970];
The Mahabharata, tr. J.A.B. van Buitenen, Chicago, 1973.

Mazhar, Sheikh Mohammad Ahmad, Sanskrit Traced to Arabic, Lahore, 1982.

Monier-Williams, Monier, Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Delhi, 1995 [1899].

Morgenstierne, Georg, Report on a Linguistic Mission to North-Western India, Norway, 1932.

Muhammad, Ghulam, ‘Festivals and Folklore of Gilgit’, in Memoirs of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Calcutta, 1907 (I).

Muir, J., Original Sanskrit Texts on the origin and history of the people of India, their religions and institutions, London, 1868-1873.

Max Müller, Friedrich, A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature: so far as it illustrates the Primitive Religion of the Brahmans, London, 1859;
India: What Can It Teach Us? A Course of Lectures Delivered Before the University of Cambridge, London, 1883;
The Science of Language: founded on lectures delivered at the Royal Institution in 1861 and 1863, London, 1891a (I);
Vedic Hymns: Hymns to the Maruts [Sacred Books of the East], tr., Oxford, 1891b;
Collected Works of Max Müller: III, Anthropological Religion, London, 1903;
‘Lecture VI: The Infinite in Nature, Man, and the Self’ in Collected works of The Right Hon. F. Max Müller: I, Natural Religion: The Gifford Lectures delivered before the University of Glasgow in 1888I from the Collected Works, London, 1907.

Neumayer, Erwin, Lines on Stone: The Prehistoric Rock Art of India, Delhi, 1993.

Parpola, Asko, ‘The coming of the Aryans to Iran and India’, in Studia Orientalia, Helsinki, 1988 (LXIV, pp.195-302).

Qamar, R. et al, ‘Y-Chromosomal DNA Variation in Pakistan’, in American Journal of Human Genetics, New York, 2002, (LXX, pp. 1107-1124).

Rajaram, N.S., ‘Aryan Invasion – History or Politics?’

Renou, Louis, Religions of Ancient India, London, 1953;
Vedic India, tr. Philip Spratt, Delhi/Varanasi, 1971.

Rivett-Carnac, J.H., ‘Prehistoric Remains in Central India’ in Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal (Part I: History, Literature, &c.), Calcutta, 1879.

Roth, Rudolph, On the Literature and History of the Veda, tr. John Muir, Calcutta, 1880.

Stacul, Giorgio, in East and West, Rome, 1969 (XIX);
Prehistoric and Protohistoric Swat, Pakistan (c.3000 BC – 1400 BC), Rome, 1987.

Stewart, Dugald, Works, The Collected Works, ed. William Hamilton, London, 1854 (IV).

Thieme, Paul, Panini and the Veda: Studies in the Early History of Linguistic Science in India, Allahabad, 1935.

Tsuchiya, Haruko, ‘Ancient Routes in Northern Pakistan; 1996 (II) and 1997 (I)’, in Maurizio Taddei & Giuseppe de Marco, eds, South Asian Archaeology 1997, Rome, 2000, pp.889-902.

Trautmann, Thomas, Aryans and British India, Berkeley, 1997.

Vigne, G.T., Travels in Kashmir, Ladak, Iskardo, the countries adjoining the mountain-course of the Indus, and the Himalaya, North of the Punjab, London, 1842.

Wada, Akiko, Kalasha: Their Life & Tradition, Lahore, 2003.

Wallis, H.W., The Cosmology of the Rigveda, an Essay, London, 1887.

Weber, Albrecht, The History of Indian Literature, tr. John Mann & Theodor Zachariae, London, 1878.

Whalley, W.B., ‘Desert varnish’ in Chemical Sediments and Geomorphology: Precipitates and Residua in the Near-Surface Environment, A.S. Goudie & Kenneth Pye, eds, London, 1983.

Wilson, H.H., tr., Rig-Veda-Sanhita. A Collection of Ancient Hindu Hymns constituting the First Ashtaka, or Book, of the Rig-Veda, London, 1850.

Witzel, Michael, ‘Tracing the Vedic Dialects’, in Dialectes dans les Littératures Indo-Aryennes, Colette Caillat, ed., Paris, 1989;
& Steve Farmer, ‘Horseplay in Harappa’ in Frontline [Magazine of The Hindu], Chennai, 2000 (XVII:20),

Young, Ruth et al, ‘Kalasha and Kho Subsistence Patterns in Chitral’, in South Asian Studies, London, 2000 (XVI).

Zerjal et al, ‘A Genetic Landscape Reshaped by Recent Events: Y-Chromosomal Insights in Central Asia’, in American Journal of Human Genetics, New York, September 2002 (LXXI: 3, pp.466-82).

Zimmermann, Francis, The Jungle and the Aroma of Meat s: An Ecological Theme in Hindu Medicine, Berkeley, 1987 [1982].

Chapter Ten

Allchin, Bridget & Raymond, The Rise of Civilization in India and Pakistan, Cambridge, 1993 [1982].

Allchin, F.R., The Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: The Emergence of Cities and States, Cambridge, 1995.

Ardeleanu-Jansen, Alexandra, ‘Who Fell Into the Well? Digging up a Well in Mohenjo-Daro’, in South Asian Archaeology 1991, eds A.J. Gail and G.J.R. Mevissen, Stuttgart, 1993.

Baloch, Nabi Bakhsh, Musical instruments of the Lower Indus Valley of Sind, Hyderabad, 1966.

Banday, Aijaz A., ‘Metal Objects of Neolithic Kashmir: Origins and Technology’, in The Journal of Central Asian Studies, Srinagar, 1999 (X:1, pp.143-148).

Carter, G.E.L., The Stone Age in Kashmir [Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of Kashmir Series], Amritsar, 1924.

Chowdhury, K.A. & S.S. Ghosh, ‘Plant Remains from Harappa 1946’, in Ancient India: Bulletin of the Archaeological Survey of India, Delhi, January 1951 (VII, pp.3-19).

Cloughley, Brian, A History of the Pakistan Army: Wars and Insurrections [Second Edition: With a New Chapter on the Kargil Issue], Karachi, 2000.

Coll, Steve, ‘Letter from Kashmir. Fault Lines: After the earthquake, some strange new alliances’ in New Yorker, New York, November 21, 2005.

Deshpande, M.N., ed., Indian Archaeology 1966-67 – A Review, New Delhi, 1975.

de Terra, H. & T.T. Paterson, Studies on the Ice Age in India and Associated Human Cultures, Washington, 1939;
de Terra, H., ‘The Megaliths of Bursahom, Kashmir, a New Prehistoric Civilization from India’ in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, September 1942 (LXXXV: 5, pp.483-504).

Diamond, Jared, Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, New York, 1999 [1997].

Ghosh, A., ed., Indian Archaeology 1961-62 – A Review, New Delhi, 1964;
Indian Archaeology 1964-65 – A Review, New Delhi, 1969;
Indian Archaeology 1965-66 – A Review, New Delhi, 1973.

Habib, Irfan, The Indus Civilization: Including Other Copper Age Cultures and History of Language Change till c. 1500 BC, New Delhi, 2002.

Hamidi, Taswir Husain, ‘Sindh Valley Civilization: New Interpretations’ in The Indus River: Biodiversity, Resources, Humankind, Azra Meadows & Peter Meadows, eds, Karachi, 1999.

India, Republic of, [National Security Council Secretariat], From Surprise to Reckoning: The Kargil Review Committee Report, Delhi, 2000.

Joshi, Jagat Pati & Madhu Bala, ‘Manda: A Harappan Site in Jammu and Kashmir’ in Gregory L. Possehl, ed., Harappan Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective, Warminster, 1982, pp.185-95.

Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark, Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization, Karachi, 1998.

Khan, Hashmatullah, History of Baltistan: Research Translation, Islamabad, 1987.

Khan, Omar, Producer,

Kumar, Virendra, Rape of the Mountains, Kargil: The Untold Story, Delhi, 1999.

Marshall, John, ‘First Light on a Long-Forgotten Civilisation: New Discoveries of an Unknown Prehistoric Past in India’ in Illustrated London News, 20 September 1924 (also 27 September 1924, 4 October 1924);
‘Unveiling the Prehistoric Civilization of India. Discoveries in Sind, the Punjab, and Baluchistan – Cities Older than Abraham’ in Illustrated London News, London, 27 February 1926 (also 6 March 1926, 7 January 1928, 14 January 1928);
ed., Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization: Being an official account of Archaeological Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro carried out by the Government of India between the years 1922 and 1927, London, 1931.

Mishra, Madhusudan, The Rgveda in the Indus Inscriptions, Delhi, 2003.

Mitra, Debala, Indian Archaeology 1979-80 – A Review, New Delhi, 1983.

Nath, Gen Rajendra, ed., Musharraf’s War, New Delhi, 2003.

Pande, B.M., ‘Neolithic Hunting Scene on a Stone Slab from Burzahom, Kashmir’, in Asian Perspectives, Hong Kong, 1971 (XIV).

Peissel, Michel, The Ants’ Gold: The Discovery of the Greek El Dorado in the Himalayas, London, 1984.

Possehl, Gregory L., ed., Harappan Civilization: A Recent Perspective Second Revised Edition, New Delhi, 1993 [1982];
The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective, Oxford, 2002.

Richter-Ushanas, Egbert, The Indus Script and the Rg-Veda, Delhi, 1997.

Rizvi, B.R., The Balti: A Scheduled Tribe of Jammu and Kashmir, New Delhi, 1993.

Sharma, Rajeev, Pak Proxy War: A Story of ISI, Bin Laden and Kargil, Delhi, 1999.

Stacul, Giorgio, Prehistoric and Protohistoric Swat, Pakistan (c.3000 BC – 1400 BC), Rome, 1987.

Swami, Praveen, ‘Unknown Heroes of Batalik’, in Frontline [Magazine of The Hindu], Chennai, July 17-30 1999 (XVI:15).

Thapar, B.K., Indian Archaeology 1973-74 – A Review, New Delhi, 1979.

Thapar, Romila, A History of India, Harmondsworth, 1966.

Waslekar, Sundeep [Strategic Foresight Group], The Final Settlement: Restructuring India-Pakistan Relations, , Mumbai, 2005.

Weber, Steven A., Plants and Harappan Subsistence: An Example of Stability and Change from Rojdi, New Delhi, 1991.

Alberuni, Alberuni’s India: An Account of the Religion, Philosophy, Literature, Geography, Chronology, Astronomy, Customs, Laws and Astrology of India about A.D.1030, tr. Edward C. Sachau, London, 1888.

Aristotle, On the parts of animals, tr. James G. Lennox, Oxford, 2002.

Armstrong, Karen, A Short History of Myth, Edinburgh, 2005.

Bemmann, Martin, ‘Rock Carvings and Inscriptions along the Karakorum Highway’ in South Asian archæology 1991: proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of the Association of South Asian Archæologists in Western Europe, eds Adalbert J. Gail and Gerd J.R. Mevissen, Stuttgart, 1993.

Bharatiya Janata Party:

Buth, Ghulam Mohd., ed., Central Asia and Western Himalaya: A Forgotten Link, Jodhpur, 1986.

Clodd, Edward, Animism, the Seed of Religion, London, 1918.

Connolly, Arthur, A Journey over land from Russia to India, London, 1834.

Cunningham, Alexander, Ladák, Physical, Statistical, and Historical; With Notices of the Surrounding Countries, London, 1854.

Curtis, Gregory, The Cave Painters: Probing the Mysteries of the First Artists, New York, 2006.

de Nebesky-Wojkowitz, René, Oracles and Demons of Tibet: The Cult and Iconography of the Tibetan Protective Deities, Kathmandu, 1996.

de Terra, H. & Paterson, T.T., Studies on the Ice Age in India and Associated Human Cultures, Washington, 1939.

Eliade, Mircea, Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy, London, 1964.

Enoki, Kazuo, ‘On the Nationality of the Ephthalites’, in Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko (Oriental Library), Tokyo, 1959 (XVIII).

Fonia, R.S., ‘Ladakh Corridor to Central Asia: An investigative report of prehistoric cultures’ in The Journal of Central Asian Studies, Srinagar, 1994? (IV, pp.35-41).

Francke, A.H., ‘The Eighteen Songs of the Bono-na Festival’ in Indian Antiquary, Bombay, May 1905, pp.93-110;
A History of Western Tibet: one of the unknown empires, London, 1907;
‘The Dards at Khalatse in Western Tibet’ in Memoirs of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Calcutta, 1907 (I);
Ten Ancient Historical Songs from Western Tibet, Bombay, 1909;
tr., Ladvags rGyalrabs. The Chronicles of Ladakh, according to Schlagintweit’s MS [From the Journal and Proceedings, Asiatic Society of Bengal], Calcutta, 1910 (VI: 8);
Antiquities of Indian Tibet, Part 1: Personal Narrative, Calcutta, 1914.

Friese, Kai, ‘The Aryan Handshake: Blood and Belonging in India’, Transition 83: An International Review, Durham, North Carolina, 2000 (IX: 3, pp.4-35).

Harvey, Andrew, A Journey in Ladakh, London, 1983.

Jiao, Ben, Socio-economic and Cultural Factors Underlying the Contemporary Revival of Fraternal Polyandry in Tibet [PhD dissertation], Case Western Reserve University, 2001:

Kalhana, Kalhana’s Rajatarangini: A Chronicle of the Kings of Kashmir, tr. M.A. Stein, London, 1900 (I).

Kantowsky, Detlef & Reinhard Sander, eds, Recent Research on Ladakh: History, Culture, Sociology, Ecology, Köln/London, 1983.

Kargil, Government of,

Karttunen, K., India in Early Greek Literature, Helsinki, 1989.

Kipling, Rudyard, Kim, Alan Sandison, ed., London, 1987 [1901].

Knight, E.F., Where Three Empires Meet, London, 1893.

Ladags Melong: Mirror of Ladakh. Ladakh’s own magazine, reflecting on all aspects of Ladakhi life & culture, ed. Sonam Wangchuk, Leh, Ladakh .

McNeill, J.R. & William H McNeill, The Human Web: A Bird’s-Eye View of World History, New York, 2003.

McNeill, William H., ‘Secrets of the Cave Paintings’ in The New York Review of Books, New York, 19 October 2006 (LIII: 16).

Moorcroft, William & George Trebeck, Travels in the Himalayan Provinces of Hindustan and the Panjab; in Ladakh and Kashmir; in Peshawar, Kabul and Kunduz, and Bokhara… from 1819 to 1825, London, 1841.

Muir, J., Original Sanskrit Texts on the Origin and Progress of the Religion and Institutions of India, London, 1860 (II).

Neumayer, Erwin, Lines on Stone: The Prehistoric Rock Art of India, Delhi, 1993.

Norberg Hodge, Helena, Ancient Futures: Learning from Ladakh, London, 2000 [1991]; Ancient Futures: Learning from Ladakh, VHS, 1993.

Orofino, Giacomella, ‘A Note on Some Tibetan Petroglyphs of the Ladakh Area’, East and West, Rome, 1990 (XL, pp.173-201).

Outlook Traveller: Ladakh The High Country, ed. Kai Friese, New Delhi, May 2006.

Pande, B.M., ‘Neolithic Hunting Scene on a Stone Slab from Burzahom, Kashmir’, in Asian Perspectives, Hong Kong, 1971 (XIV).

Peissel, Michel, The Ants’ Gold: The Discovery of the Greek El Dorado in the Himalayas, London, 1984.

Peter, Prince of Greece and Denmark, A Study of Polyandry, The Hague, 1963.

Rao, N Kameswara, ‘Observational Astronomy and Ancient Monuments in India’, in LK Srinivasan & S Nagaraju, eds, Sri Nagabhinandanam: Dr MS Nagaraja Rao Festschrift: Essays on Art, Culture, History, Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Conservation of Cultural Property of India and Neighbouring Countries, Bangalore, 1995, pp.861-895.

Roerich, George N., Trails to Inmost Asia: Five Years of Exploration with the Roerich Central Asian Expedition, Delhi 1996 [1931].

Rushdie, Salman, Shalimar the Clown, London, 2005.

Vahia, M.N. et al, ‘Astronomical interpretation of a Palaeolithic rock carving found at Sopor, Kashmir’, to appear in Puratatva [Journal of Indian Archaeological Society], 2006,;
et al, ‘Oldest sky-chart with Supernova record’, to appear in Puratatva [Journal of Indian Archaeological Society], 2006,;
et al, ‘Analysis of the picture found at Bomai in Sopore area by Mumtaz Ahmed Yatoo of Centre for Central Asian Studies, Srinagar, April 2005’ [Unpublished], 2006.

Vernier, Martin, Exploration et documentation des pétroglyphes du Ladakh, 1996-2006, Como, 2007.

Vohra, Rohit, ‘Ethnographic Notes on the Buddhist Dards of Ladakh: The Brog-Pa’ in Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, Berlin, 1982 (CVII: 1, pp.69-94);
‘History of the Dards and the Concept of Minaro Traditions Among the Buddhist Dards in Ladakh’ in Detlef Kantowsky & Reinhard Sander, eds, Recent Research on Ladakh: History, Culture, Sociology, Ecology, Köln/London, 1983;
An Ethnography: The Buddhist Dards of Ladakh: “Mythic Lore – Household – Alliance System – Kingship”, Ettelbruck, 1989a;
The Religion of the Dards of Ladakh: Investigations into their pre-Buddhist ’Brog-pa Traditions, Ettelbruck, 1989b;
‘Antiquities on the Southern Arteries of the Silk Route: Ethnic Movements and New Discoveries’, in Anthropology of Tibet and the Himalaya, eds Charles Ramble and Martin Brauen, Zurich, 1990? (pp.386-405).
Rock Art in Ladakh: Collected & Documented by Rohit Vohra A Result of Field Trips to Ladakh in 1979, 1980, 1983 & 1986, Grosbous, 2005.

Xuanzang, Si Yu Ki: Buddhist Records of the Western World, Translated from the Chinese of Hiuen Tsiang (AD 629) by Samuel Beal, London, 2000 [1884].

Chapter Twelve

Ahmad, Mohammad Farooq, ‘The Wildlife of the Indus River and Allied Areas’, in The Indus River: Biodiversity, Resources, Humankind, Azra Meadows and Peter Meadows, eds, Karachi, 1999.

Allen, Charles, A Mountain in Tibet, London, 1982 [2003];
The Search for Shangri-La: a journey into Tibetan history, London, 1999.

Allwright, Gavin & Atsushi Kanamaru, eds, Mapping the Tibetan World, Tokyo, 2004 [2000].

Ansari, Ishtiaq, ‘Kerigar: Gold Pickers of the Indus’, Journal of Pakistan Archaeologists Forum, Asma Ibrahim and Kaleem Lashari, eds, Karachi, 1993 (2: 1&2, pp.155-166).

Bertsch, Wolfgang, The Currency of Tibet: A Sourcebook for the Study of Tibetan Coins, Paper Money and other Forms of Currency, Dharamsala, 2002.

Burrard, S.G. & H.H. Hayden, A Sketch of the Geography and Geology of the Himalaya Mountains and Tibet, Delhi, 1933.

Chan, Victor, Tibet Handbook, Chico, 1994.

China, Ministry of Land and Resources PRC, ‘Communique on Land and Resources of China 2005’:

China Daily:

Clift, Peter D., ‘A brief history of the Indus River’ in The Tectonic and Climatic Evolution of the Arabian Sea Region, eds Peter D. Clift et al, London, 2002.

Das, Karashni Narayan, Shri Sindh Sapt Nad Sadhubela Teerath Mahatamay [The Importance of the Seven Rivers of Shri Sindh, Sadhubela Teerath, Anthology of passages about the Indus from Hindu scriptures in Sindhi and Sanskrit], Sukkur, 1922.

Dewey, J.F. et al, The Geological Evolution of Tibet: Report of the 1985 Royal Society-Academic Sinica Geotraverse of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, London 1988.

Dorst, Jean, The Migrations of Birds, tr. Constance D. Sherman, London, 1962 [Paris, 1956].

Elliott McClure, H., Migrations and Survival of the Birds of Asia, Bangkok, 1998 [1974].

Fairley, Jean, The Lion River: The Indus, London, 1975.

Hasan, Mubashir, Birds of the Indus, Karachi, 2001.

Hedin, Sven, Trans-Himalaya: Discoveries and Adventures in Tibet, London, 1909.

Herald, Earl S. et al, ‘Blind River-Dolphin: First Side-Swimming Cetacean’, in Science, New York, 12 December 1969 (CLXVI, pp.1408-1410).

Herodotus, The Histories, tr. George Rawlinson, London, 1992 [1910].

Jiao, Ben, Socio-economic and Cultural Factors Underlying the Contemporary Revival of Fraternal Polyandry in Tibet [PhD dissertation], Case Western Reserve University, 2001:

Jones, Schuyler, Tibetan Nomads: Environment, Pastoral Economy, and Material Culture, Copenhagen/London, 1996.

Meadows, Azra & Peter Meadows, eds, The Indus River: Biodiversity, Resources, Humankind, Karachi, 1999.

Monbiot, George, ‘The freshwater boom is over. Our rivers are starting to run dry’, The Guardian, London, 10 October 2006.

Monier-Williams, Monier, Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Delhi, 1995 [1899].

Oppenheimer, Stephen, Out of Eden: The peopling of the world, London, 2003.

Pauwels, Heidi R.M., ‘The Great Goddess and Fulfillment in Love: Radha Seen Through a Sixteenth-Century Lens’, in Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, London, 1996.

Peissel, Michel, Tibet The Secret Continent, London, 2002.

Pranavananda, Swami, Exploration in Tibet, Calcutta, 1939.

Sivananda, Swami, A trip of Sacred Kailas-Mansarowar, Rishikesh, 1932.

Tibet, Government of in Exile, ‘State of Tibet’s Environment’, 2 February 1996,;
Tibet Under Communist China: Fifty Years [by the Department of Information and International Relations, Central Tibetan Administration], Dharamsala, 2001.

Tibet Information Network, Mining Tibet: Mineral exploitation in Tibetan areas of the PRC, London, 2002.